首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Medical Association Journal >Allergy testing: comparison of skin and in vitro tests of allergic reagin.
【2h】

Allergy testing: comparison of skin and in vitro tests of allergic reagin.

机译:过敏测试:比较皮肤和体外对过敏素的测试。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Skin tests have been used for many years to detect reaginic antibodies in the investigation of allergic patients. Recently in vitro assays of allergic reagins, including the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and the rat mast cell test (RMCT) have become available. A comparison of the clinical usefulness of these tests suggested that skin tests and the RAST are of comparable diagnostic accuracy and reliability. The RMCT was found to be poorly reproducible and unreliable. For routine cases skin tests should continue to be the procedure of choice. The RAST may reasonably be used when skin tests are unreliable, impractical or contraindicated. The RAST may also be helpful in some cases in resolving discrepancies between skin test results and the clinical history.
机译:在过敏患者的研究中,皮肤测试已被用于检测尿囊素抗体多年。最近,对过敏性凝集素的体外测定,包括放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)和大鼠肥大细胞试验(RMCT),已经可用。比较这些测试的临床实用性表明,皮肤测试和RAST具有可比的诊断准确性和可靠性。发现RMCT的可复制性差且不可靠。对于常规情况,应继续选择皮肤测试。当皮肤测试不可靠,不切实际或禁忌时,可以合理使用RAST。在某些情况下,RAST也可能有助于解决皮肤测试结果与临床病史之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号