首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology >Investigation of the Local Recurrence Rate after Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Is Incomplete Polyp Resection Really a Clinically Important Problem? Analysis of the Rationale for the Resect and Discard Strategy
【2h】

Investigation of the Local Recurrence Rate after Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Is Incomplete Polyp Resection Really a Clinically Important Problem? Analysis of the Rationale for the Resect and Discard Strategy

机译:大肠内窥镜黏膜切除术后局部复发率的调查:不完全的息肉切除术确实是一个重要的临床问题吗? 断断续续战略的理论基础分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background/Aims The “Resect and Discard” strategy is a potentially useful strategy. At present, only the lesion size and accuracy of diagnosis are cited as considerations for clinical adoption of this strategy. On the other hand, histopathology of the resected specimens after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) reveals often an unclear or positive-margin status, implying Incomplete Polyp Resection (IPR). If IPR indeed increased the risk of local recurrence, histopathological evaluation of the margin would be indispensable and clinical adoption of this strategy is difficult. The aim of this study is to verify the association between IPR and the risk of local recurrence.
机译:背景/目标“切除并丢弃”策略是一种潜在有用的策略。目前,仅将病变的大小和诊断的准确性作为临床采用该策略的考虑因素。另一方面,内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)后切除的标本的组织病理学常常显示出不清楚或阳性的边缘状态,这意味着息肉切除术(IPR)不完全。如果IPR确实增加了局部复发的风险,则对边缘的组织病理学评估将是必不可少的,并且该策略的临床采用将非常困难。这项研究的目的是验证知识产权与局部复发风险之间的关联。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号