首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine >Comparative study of serological methods for the detection of antibodies to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
【2h】

Comparative study of serological methods for the detection of antibodies to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

机译:血清学方法检测猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒抗体的比较研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A comparison was made of serological diagnostic methods used for the detection of antibodies against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus. In the "phase I" PRRS test panel comparison, a panel of sera collected from 135 pigs of various ages, from North American herds with and without PRRS histories, were sent to 4 different laboratories and tested by an indirect immunofluorescent assay (IFA), an immunoperoxidase monolayer assay (IPMA) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). In the "phase II" PRRS test panel comparison, a panel of 382 sera collected from pigs of various ages, PRRS histories, and from various locations in North America and France, were divided into 2 panels (A & B) and sent to 3 Canadian laboratories and tested by the IFA and iELISA. In the phase I comparison, agreement between the IFA of laboratory 4 and the iELISA and IPMA of laboratory 3 was excellent (kappa values of 95% and 98%, respectively). This contrasted with the poor agreement between these laboratories and the IFA results of laboratories 1 and 2 in the phase I trial. In the phase II comparison, the results demonstrated good agreement between various tests both within and between laboratories. The overall performance of the iELISA was superior in the combination of sensitivity (96.1%) and specificity (100%) relative to the reference classification of the serum samples and repeatability (kappa value 98%). The iELISA is technically superior to IFA and IPMA, time efficient, cost effective and suitable for testing of a large number of samples over a short period of time. Thus, the iELISA may be a better alternative to IFA or IPMA for routine detection of PRRS viral antibodies in swine sera.
机译:比较了用于检测针对猪繁殖与呼吸综合症(PRRS)病毒的抗体的血清学诊断方法。在“第一阶段” PRRS测试小组比较中,将来自有和没有PRRS历史的北美群的135头不同年龄的猪收集的一组血清送至4个不同的实验室,并通过间接免疫荧光测定(IFA)进行了测试,免疫过氧化物酶单层测定(IPMA)和间接酶联免疫吸附测定(iELISA)。在“第二阶段” PRRS测试小组比较中,从不同年龄,PRRS历史以及在北美和法国不同地点的猪中收集的382份血清被分为2个小组(A和B),并分配给3个小组。加拿大实验室,并通过IFA和iELISA测试。在第一阶段比较中,实验室4的IFA与实验室3的iELISA和IPMA之间的一致性非常好(κ值分别为95%和98%)。这与这些实验室与IFA实验室1和2的IFA结果之间的共识不一致。在第二阶段的比较中,结果表明实验室内部和实验室之间的各种测试之间具有良好的一致性。相对于血清样品的参考分类和可重复性(κ值98%),iELISA的总体性能在灵敏度(96.1%)和特异性(100%)的组合方面更胜一筹。 iELISA在技术上优于IFA和IPMA,具有时间效率高,成本效益高的特点,并且适合在短时间内测试大量样品。因此,对于常规检测猪血清中PRRS病毒抗体,iELISA可能是IFA或IPMA的更好替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号