首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cambridge Open Access >‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain
【2h】

‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain

机译:拯救我们的狗的生命:两次世界大战期间英国犬瘟热疫苗的研制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper examines the successful campaign in Britain to develop canine distemper vaccine between 1922 and 1933. The campaign mobilized disparate groups around the common cause of using modern science to save the nation's dogs from a deadly disease. Spearheaded by landed patricians associated with the country journal The Field, and funded by dog owners and associations, it relied on collaborations with veterinary professionals, government scientists, the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the commercial pharmaceutical house the Burroughs Wellcome Company (BWC). The social organization of the campaign reveals a number of important, yet previously unexplored, features of interwar science and medicine in Britain. It depended on a patronage system that drew upon a large base of influential benefactors and public subscriptions. Coordinated by the Field Distemper Fund, this system was characterized by close relationships between landed elites and their social networks with senior science administrators and researchers. Relations between experts and non-experts were crucial, with high levels of public engagement in all aspects of research and vaccine development. At the same time, experimental and commercial research supported under the campaign saw dynamic interactions between animal and human medicine, which shaped the organization of the MRC's research programme and demonstrated the value of close collaboration between veterinary and medical science, with the dog as a shared object and resource. Finally, the campaign made possible the translation of ‘laboratory’ findings into field conditions and commercial products. Rather than a unidirectional process, translation involved negotiations over the very boundaries of the ‘laboratory’ and the ‘field’, and what constituted a viable vaccine. This paper suggests that historians reconsider standard historical accounts of the nature of patronage, the role of animals, and the interests of landed elites in interwar British science and medicine.
机译:本文考察了英国在​​1922年至1933年间成功开发犬瘟热疫苗的运动。该运动动员了不同群体,围绕利用现代科学挽救该国犬只免受致命疾病的共同原因。它由与乡村杂志《田野》相关联的土地贵族牵头,并由犬只主人和协会资助,依靠与兽医专业人士,政府科学家,医学研究理事会(MRC)和商业制药公司Burroughs Wellcome Company(BWC)的合作。这场运动的社会组织揭示了英国两次战争之间科学和医学的许多重要但尚未开发的特征。它依赖于一个有大量有影响力的恩人和公众订阅的赞助系统。该系统由“田野狂热者基金会”(Field Distemper Fund)协调,其特点是土地精英及其社交网络与高级科学行政人员和研究人员之间的密切关系。专家和非专家之间的关系至关重要,公众在研究和疫苗开发的各个方面都有很高的参与度。同时,在这项运动的支持下进行的实验和商业研究看到了动物与人类医学之间的动态互动,这塑造了MRC研究计划的组织,并证明了兽医与医学之间密切合​​作的价值,这只狗是共享的对象和资源。最后,该运动使“实验室”发现转化为现场条件和商业产品成为可能。翻译不是单向的过程,而是涉及在“实验室”和“现场”的边界上进行谈判,以及构成可行疫苗的方法。本文建议历史学家重新考虑关于光顾性质,动物的作用以及陆上精英在战时英国科学和医学中的利益的标准历史记载。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号