首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine >Challenges of Conducting Community-Based Participatory Research in Boston’s Neighborhoods to Reduce Disparities in Asthma
【2h】

Challenges of Conducting Community-Based Participatory Research in Boston’s Neighborhoods to Reduce Disparities in Asthma

机译:在波士顿社区开展社区参与式研究以减少哮喘差异的挑战

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Boston is one of the preeminent health care and research centers in the world, but for much of its urban core, these resources are largely out of reach. Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) provides a model with the potential to bridge the gaps between its research prominence and the health of its residents. We report here two case studies of major research projects that were partnerships between universities in Boston and community based organizations and city agencies. The Healthy Public Housing Initiative (HPHI) and the Asthma Center on Community Environment and Social Stress (ACCESS) are projects that provide numerous lessons about the potential and challenges of conducting CBPR. Ensuring that the projects were true partnerships emerged as key issues in both, especially with respect to funding mechanisms and distribution of resources, although the nature of the challenges differed substantially in the two projects. We note that both academic and community partners may harbor stereotypes about the other and that generalizations about broad populations, academics or community members, may not apply well to everyone. Aligning objectives and expectations emerged as another key lesson. In HPHI, tension between service delivery and research was both a source of conflict and a source of creative development that led to divergent but interesting outcomes. In ACCESS, the tensions revolved more around community capacity building while attempting to build and maintain a large cohort for epidemiological investigations. We conclude that open and frank discussion and a transparent process upfront about project direction, finances, expectations, and other dimensions are necessary but not sufficient to address the inherent challenges in CBPR, and that even so, there are likely to be differences in perspective in such partnerships that require honest negotiation throughout the process of the project.
机译:波士顿是世界上杰出的卫生保健和研究中心之一,但是对于其大部分城市核心地区,这些资源在很大程度上是遥不可及的。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)提供了一种模型,该模型具有弥合其研究重要性与居民健康之间的差距的潜力。我们在此报告两个重大研究项目的案例研究,这些案例是波士顿大学与社区组织和城市机构之间的合作伙伴关系。健康公共住房计划(HPHI)和社区环境与社会压力哮喘中心(ACCESS)是为开展CBPR的潜力和挑战提供大量课程的项目。确保项目是真正的伙伴关系,这两者都是关键问题,特别是在筹资机制和资源分配方面,尽管这两个项目的挑战性质大不相同。我们注意到,学术合作伙伴和社区合作伙伴可能对彼此都抱有定型观念,而有关广泛人群,学者或社区成员的概括可能不适用于每个人。使目标和期望保持一致是另一个重要的教训。在HPHI中,服务交付和研究之间的紧张关系既是冲突的根源,也是创造力发展的源泉,导致产生分歧但有趣的结果。在ACCESS中,紧张关系更多地围绕社区能力建设,同时试图建立和维持大量的流行病学调查队列。我们得出结论,关于项目方向,财务,期望和其他方面的公开,坦率的讨论和透明的流程是必要的,但不足以解决CBPR中固有的挑战,即使如此,在CBPR中的观点仍可能存在差异这种伙伴关系需要在整个项目过程中进行诚实的谈判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号