首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletins of the Public Health >Evaluation of an extended degree program in public health for working professionals.
【2h】

Evaluation of an extended degree program in public health for working professionals.

机译:为在职专业人员评估公共卫生扩展学位课程。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The faculty of the School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, developed an extended degree program in health services administration for persons who could not attend the university full time. Course formats were redesigned so the courses could be taught off campus in Sacramento and in the San Francisco Bay Area. The extended degree program was designed to be the equivalent of the in-residence program in all respects: the minimum number of units required for the degree was the same and regular faculty taught in both programs. The course of study for the two programs was similar; a major difference, however, was that many more electives were available to on-campus students. Two cohorts of extended degree students were admitted (34 and 37), and 61 completed the program. This article evaluates the success of that program. Evaluation began in 1980, 4 years after the first cohort, and 2 years after the second cohort were graduated--sufficient time for the graduates and faculty to reflect on their experiences. By the measures used--entering grade point average, graduating grade point average, and scores on a common comprehensive examination--the two groups were comparable. Faculty and students alike evaluated the program favorably. All but one graduate stated that they would recommend this program to others if it were available.
机译:加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校公共卫生学院的教职员工为无法全日制大学进修的人员制定了卫生服务管理扩展学位课程。课程格式经过了重新设计,因此可以在萨克拉曼多和旧金山湾区的校园外教授这些课程。扩展学位课程的设计在所有方面均与居留计划等效:该学位所需的最少单元数是相同的,并且两个课程中均设有正规教职人员。这两个程序的学习过程相似。但是,主要的不同是,在校学生可以使用更多的选修课。录取了两个大专学历的学生(34和37),其中61个完成了该课程。本文评估该程序的成功。评估始于1980年,即第一批研究组毕业后的第四年和第二批研究组毕业后的第二年-足够的时间让毕业生和教职员工反思他们的经历。通过所采用的测量方法-输入平均成绩,毕业平均成绩和共同综合考试成绩-两组是可比较的。教师和学生都对该计划给予了积极评价。除一名毕业生外,其他所有人都表示,如果有此计划,他们会向其他人推荐该计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号