首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial

机译:筛查2型糖尿病的心理影响:对照试验和ADDITION(剑桥)随机对照试验中包含的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To quantify the psychological impact of primary care based stepwise screening for type 2 diabetes.>Design Controlled trial and comparative study embedded in a randomised controlled trial. >Setting 15 practices (10 screening, five control) in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial in the east of England.>Participants 7380 adults (aged 40-69) in the top fourth for risk of having undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (6416 invited for screening, 964 controls).>Interventions Invited for screening for type 2 diabetes or not invited (controls), incorporating a comparative study of subgroups of screening attenders. Attenders completed questionnaires after a random blood glucose test and at 3-6 months and 12-15 months later. Controls were sent questionnaires at corresponding time points. Non-attenders were sent questionnaires at 3-6 months and 12-15 months.>Main outcome measures State anxiety (Spielberger state anxiety inventory), anxiety and depression (hospital anxiety and depression scale), worry about diabetes, and self rated health.>Results No significant differences were found between the screening and control participants at any time—for example, difference in means (95% confidence intervals) for state anxiety after the initial blood glucose test was −0.53, −2.60 to 1.54, at 3-6 months was 1.51 (−0.17 to 3.20), and at 12-15 months was 0.57, −1.11 to 2.24. After the initial test, compared with participants who screened negative, those who screened positive reported significantly poorer general health (difference in means −0.19, −0.25 to −0.13), higher state anxiety (0.93, −0.02 to 1.88), higher depression (0.32, 0.08 to 0.56), and higher worry about diabetes (0.25, 0.09 to 0.41), although effect sizes were small. Small but significant trends were found for self rated health across the screening subgroups at 3-6 months (P=0.047) and for worry about diabetes across the screen negative groups at 3-6 months and 12-15 months (P=0.001).>Conclusions Screening for type 2 diabetes has limited psychological impact on patients. Implementing a national screening programme based on the stepwise screening procedure used in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial is unlikely to have significant consequences for patients' psychological health.>Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN99175498.
机译:>目的以量化基于初级保健的2型糖尿病逐步筛查的心理影响。>设计对照试验和纳入随机对照试验的比较研究。 >设置在英格兰东部的ADDITION(剑桥)试验中进行15种练习(10个筛查,五个对照)。>参与者排名前四的参与者为7380名成年人(40-69岁)患有未确诊的2型糖尿病的风险(邀请6416名患者进行筛查,964名对照组)。>干预邀请接受筛查的2型糖尿病患者或未接受邀请的2型糖尿病(对照组),纳入了筛查参与者亚组的比较研究。参加者在随机血糖测试后以及3-6个月和12-15个月后完成问卷调查。在相应的时间点向对照组发送问卷。在3-6个月和12-15个月向非参与者发送问卷。>主要结果指标:状态焦虑(Spielberger状态焦虑清单),焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表),对糖尿病的担心>结果,筛查参与者和对照组参与者在任何时候都没有发现显着差异,例如,初次血糖测试后状态焦虑的均值差异(95%置信区间)为-0.53,-2.60至1.54、3-6个月为1.51(-0.17至3.20),以及12-15个月为0.57,-1.11至2.24。在初次测试后,与筛查阴性的参与者相比,筛查阳性的参与者报告总体健康状况明显较差(均值-0.19,-0.25至-0.13),状态焦虑较高(0.93,-0.02至1.88),抑郁较高( 0.32、0.08至0.56)和更高的糖尿病担忧(0.25、0.09至0.41),尽管效果很小。在3-6个月时,筛查亚组的自我评估健康状况呈小幅但显着的趋势(P = 0.047),在3-6个月和12-15个月时,筛查阴性人群对糖尿病的担忧(P = 0.001)。 >结论:筛查2型糖尿病对患者的心理影响有限。根据在ADDITION(剑桥)试验中使用的逐步筛查程序实施国家筛查计划,不会对患者的心理健康产生重大影响。>试验注册现行对照试验ISRCTN99175498。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号