首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Impact of rapid screening tests on acquisition of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: cluster randomised crossover trial
【2h】

Impact of rapid screening tests on acquisition of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: cluster randomised crossover trial

机译:快速筛查测试对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的获得的影响:整群随机交叉试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To determine whether introducing a rapid test for meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening leads to a reduction in MRSA acquisition on hospital general wards.>Design Cluster randomised crossover trial.>Setting Medical, surgical, elderly care, and oncology wards of a London teaching hospital on two sites.>Main outcome measure MRSA acquisition rate (proportion of patients negative for MRSA who became MRSA positive).>Participants All patients admitted to the study wards who were MRSA negative on admission and screened for MRSA on discharge.>Intervention Rapid polymerase chain reaction based screening test for MRSA compared with conventional culture.>Results Of 9608 patients admitted to study wards, 8374 met entry criteria and 6888 had full data (82.3%); 3335 in the control arm and 3553 in the rapid test arm. The overall MRSA carriage rate on admission was 6.7%. Rapid tests led to a reduction in median reporting time from admission, from 46 to 22 hours (P<0.001). Rapid testing also reduced the number of inappropriate pre-emptive isolation days between the control and intervention arms (399 v 277, P<0.001). This was not seen in other measurements of resource use. MRSA was acquired by 108 (3.2%) patients in the control arm and 99 (2.8%) in the intervention arm. When predefined confounding factors were taken into account the adjusted odds ratio was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.234). Rates of MRSA transmission, wound infection, and bacteraemia were not statistically different between the two arms.>Conclusion A rapid test for MRSA led to the quick receipt of results and had an impact on bed usage. No evidence was found of a significant reduction in MRSA acquisition and on these data it is unlikely that the increased costs of rapid tests can be justified compared with alternative control measures against MRSA.>Trial registration Clinical controlled trials ISRCTN75590122.
机译:>目的:要确定对甲氧西林抗性金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)筛查进行快速测试是否会导致医院普通病房MRSA的获取量减少。>设计整群随机交叉试验。在两个地点的strong>设置伦敦教学医院的内科,外科,老年护理和肿瘤病房。>主要结局指标 MRSA采集率(MRSA阴性并变为MRSA阳性的患者比例)。>参与者所有进入研究病房的患者入院时MRSA阴性,出院时进行MRSA筛查。>干预基于快速聚合酶链反应的MRSA筛查测试与常规相比>结果:在进入研究病房的9608名患者中,有8374名符合入组标准,有6888名拥有完整数据(占82.3%);控制臂中的3335和快速测试臂中的3553。入院时总体MRSA携带率为6.7%。快速测试使入院后的中位报告时间从46小时减少到22小时(P <0.001)。快速测试还减少了对照组和干预组之间不适当的先发隔离天数(399 v 277,P <0.001)。在其他资源使用量测中未发现这一点。对照组中有108名(3.2%)患者获得了MRSA,干预组中有99名(2.8%)患者获得了MRSA。当考虑到预定义的混杂因素时,调整后的优势比为0.91(95%置信区间0.61至1.234)。两组之间的MRSA传播,伤口感染和菌血症发生率无统计学差异。>结论对MRSA的快速检测可快速获得结果,并影响床的使用。没有证据表明MRSA的获得量显着减少,并且根据这些数据,与针对MRSA的替代控制措施相比,不可能证明快速测试的成本增加是合理的。>试验注册临床对照试验ISRCTN75590122。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号