首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Obstetric outcomes after treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Obstetric outcomes after treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:妊娠期牙周疾病治疗后的产科预后:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To examine whether treatment of periodontal disease with scaling and root planing during pregnancy is associated with a reduction in the preterm birth rate.>Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.>Data sources Cochrane Central Trials Registry, ISI Web of Science, Medline, and reference lists of relevant studies to July 2010; hand searches in key journals.>Study selection Randomised controlled trials including pregnant women with documented periodontal disease randomised to either treatment with scaling and root planing or no treatment.>Data extraction Data were extracted by two independent investigators, and a consensus was reached with the involvement a third. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool, and trials were considered either high or low quality. The primary outcome was preterm birth (<37 weeks). Secondary outcomes were low birthweight infants (<2500 g), spontaneous abortions/stillbirths, and overall adverse pregnancy outcome (preterm birth <37 weeks and spontaneous abortions/stillbirths).>Results 11 trials (with 6558 women) were included. Five trials were considered to be of high methodological quality (low risk of bias), whereas the rest were low quality (high or unclear risk of bias). Results among low and high quality trials were consistently diverse; low quality trials supported a beneficial effect of treatment, and high quality trials provided clear evidence that no such effect exists. Among high quality studies, treatment had no significant effect on the overall rate of preterm birth (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.40; P=0.15). Furthermore, treatment did not reduce the rate of low birthweight infants (odds ratio 1.07, 0.85 to 1.36; P=0.55), spontaneous abortions/stillbirths (0.79, 0.51 to 1.22; P=0.28), or overall adverse pregnancy outcome (preterm births <37 weeks and spontaneous abortions/stillbirths) (1.09, 0.91 to 1.30; P=0.34).>Conclusion Treatment of periodontal disease with scaling and root planing cannot be considered to be an efficient way of reducing the incidence of preterm birth. Women may be advised to have periodical dental examinations during pregnancy to test their dental status and may have treatment for periodontal disease. However, they should be told that such treatment during pregnancy is unlikely to reduce the risk of preterm birth or low birthweight infants.
机译:>目的以检查妊娠期采用牙垢和根部平整术治疗牙周病是否与早产率降低相关。>设计随机对照的系统评价和荟萃分析>数据来源:Cochrane中央试验注册中心,ISI Web of Science,Medline以及截至2010年7月的相关研究参考文献清单; >研究选择,包括有牙周病的孕妇的随机对照试验,随机分为采用刮治和根治术或不进行治疗。>数据提取由两名独立调查员组成,第三人参与达成共识。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估了研究的方法学质量,并认为试验的质量高低。主要结局是早产(<37周)。次要结局为低出生体重婴儿(<2500 g),自然流产/死产和总体不良妊娠结局(早产<37周和自然流产/死产)。>结果 11项试验(6558名妇女)被包括在内。五项试验被认为具有较高的方法学质量(偏倚风险低),而其余试验质量低下(偏倚风险高或不清楚)。低质量和高质量试验的结果始终是不同的。低质量的试验支持治疗的有益效果,而高质量的试验提供了明确的证据表明不存在这种效果。在高质量的研究中,治疗对早产的总体发生率没有显着影响(优势比1.15,95%置信区间0.95至1.40; P = 0.15)。此外,治疗并未降低低体重儿的发生率(几率1.07,0.85至1.36; P = 0.55),自然流产/死产(0.79,0.51至1.22; P = 0.28)或总体不良妊娠结局(早产) <37周和自然流产/死产(1.09,0.91至1.30; P = 0.34)。>结论用牙垢和牙根整治牙周病不能被认为是降低发病率的有效方法早产建议女性在怀孕期间进行定期牙齿检查以测试其牙齿状况,并可能接受牙周疾病的治疗。但是,应该告诉他们,怀孕期间的这种治疗不太可能降低早产或低体重儿的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号