首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Quality of care delivered by general internists in US hospitals who graduated from foreign versus US medical schools: observational study
【2h】

Quality of care delivered by general internists in US hospitals who graduated from foreign versus US medical schools: observational study

机译:毕业于外国医学院或美国医学院的美国医院普通内科医师提供的护理质量:观察性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To determine whether patient outcomes differ between general internists who graduated from a medical school outside the United States and those who graduated from a US medical school. >Design Observational study. >Setting Medicare, USA. >Participants 20% national sample of data for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older admitted to hospital with a medical condition in 2011-14 and treated by international or US medical graduates who were general internists. The study sample for mortality analysis included 1 215 490 admissions to the hospital treated by 44 227 general internists. >Main outcome measures Patients’ 30 day mortality and readmission rates, and costs of care per hospital admission, with adjustment for patient and physician characteristics and hospital fixed effects (effectively comparing physicians within the same hospital). As a sensitivity analysis, we focused on physicians who specialize in the care of patients admitted to hospital (“hospitalists”), who typically work in shifts and whose patients are plausibly quasi-randomized based on the physicians’ work schedules. >Results Compared with patients treated by US graduates, patients treated by international graduates had slightly more chronic conditions. After adjustment for patient and physician characteristics and hospital fixed effects, patients treated by international graduates had lower mortality (adjusted mortality 11.2% v 11.6%; adjusted odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 0.96; P<0.001) and slightly higher costs of care per admission (adjusted costs $1145 (£950; €1080) v $1098; adjusted difference $47, 95% confidence interval $39 to $55, P<0.001). Readmission rates did not differ between the two types of graduates. Similar differences in patient outcomes were observed among hospitalists. Differences in patient mortality were not explained by differences in length of stay, spending level, or discharge location. >Conclusions Data on older Medicare patients admitted to hospital in the US showed that patients treated by international graduates had lower mortality than patients cared for by US graduates.
机译:>目的:确定从美国以外的医学院毕业的普通内科医师与从美国医学院毕业的普通内科医师之间患者的结局是否存在差异。 >设计。观察性研究。 >设置,美国Medicare。 >参与者:2011-14年接受过医疗保健并由国际或美国医学毕业生作为普通内科医师就诊的65岁或65岁以上医疗保险付费受益人的国家/地区数据样本的20% 。死亡率分析的研究样本包括由44 227普通内科医师治疗的1 215 490住院患者。 >主要结局指标:患者的30天死亡率和再入院率,以及每次住院的护理费用,并会根据患者和医生的特征以及医院的固定效果进行调整(有效比较同一家医院内的医生)。作为敏感性分析,我们集中于专门照顾住院患者的医生(“医院专家”),这些医生通常轮班工作,并且根据医生的工作时间表合理地将患者随机化。 >结果与美国毕业生接受治疗的患者相比,国际毕业生接受治疗的患者的慢性病略多。在对患者和医生的特征以及医院固定效果进行调整之后,由国际毕业生治疗的患者死亡率较低(调整后的死亡率为11.2%对11.6%;调整后的优势比为0.95,95%的置信区间为0.93至0.96; P <0.001),费用略高每次入院护理费用(调整后的费用$ 1145(£950;€1080)v $ 1098;调整后的差额$ 47,95%置信区间$ 39至$ 55,P <0.001)。两种类型的毕业生的再入学率没有差异。住院医生之间观察到相似的患者结局差异。住院时间,花费水平或出院地点的差异并未解释患者死亡率的差异。 >结论。有关在美国住院的老年Medicare患者的数据表明,国际毕业生治疗的患者的死亡率低于美国毕业生治疗的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号