首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >General practitioners perceptions of chronic fatigue syndrome and beliefs about its management compared with irritable bowel syndrome: qualitative study
【2h】

General practitioners perceptions of chronic fatigue syndrome and beliefs about its management compared with irritable bowel syndrome: qualitative study

机译:与易怒肠综合征相比全科医师对慢性疲劳综合征的认识和对其管理的信念:定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives To compare general practitioners' perceptions of chronic fatigue syndrome and irritable bowel syndrome and to consider the implications of their perceptions for treatment.>Design Qualitative analysis of transcripts of group discussions.>Participants and setting A randomly selected sample of 46 general practitioners in England.>Results The participants tended to stereotype patients with chronic fatigue syndrome as having certain undesirable traits. This stereotyping was due to the lack of a precise bodily location; the reclassification of the syndrome over time; transgression of social roles, with patients seen as failing to conform to the work ethic and “sick role” and conflict between doctor and patient over causes and management. These factors led to difficulties for many general practitioners in managing patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. For both conditions many participants would not consider referral for mental health interventions, even though the doctors recognised social and psychological factors, because they were not familiar with the interventions or thought them unavailable or unnecessary.>Conclusions Barriers to the effective clinical management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome are partly due to doctors' beliefs, which result in negative stereotyping of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and the use of management strategies for both syndromes that may not take into account the best available evidence.
机译:>目标:比较全科医生对慢性疲劳综合征和肠易激综合征的看法,并考虑他们的看法对治疗的影响。>设计对小组讨论的笔录进行定性分析。 strong>参与者和环境随机抽取了英格兰46名全科医生的样本。>结果参与者倾向于将慢性疲劳综合症患者定型为具有某些不良特征。这种陈规定型观念是由于缺乏精确的身体位置;随着时间的推移对综合征进行重新分类;违反社会角色,患者被视为不符合职业道德和“病态角色”,医患之间因原因和管理而发生冲突。这些因素导致许多全科医生难以治疗慢性疲劳综合症。对于这两种情况,即使医生认识到社会和心理因素,许多参加者也不会考虑转介进行心理健康干预,因为他们不熟悉这些干预措施或认为它们不可用或不必要。>结论对肠易激综合症和慢性疲劳综合症患者的有效临床管理部分是由于医生的信念,这导致对慢性疲劳综合症患者的负面定型观念以及对这两种综合症的管理策略的使用可能未考虑到现有最佳方法证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号