首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Novel approach to antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Novel approach to antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): randomised controlled trial

机译:经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)预防抗生素的新方法:随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To evaluate a new and simpler strategy of antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).>Design Single centre, two arm, randomised, controlled, double blind clinical trial.>Setting Endoscopy unit in Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, between 3 June 2005 and 31 October 2009.>Participants 234 patients with an indication for PEG who gave informed consent to participate.>Intervention A single 20 ml dose of the oral solution of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim (also known as co-trimoxazole or Bactrim; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) deposited in the PEG catheter immediately after insertion. The control group received standard prophylaxis consisting of a single intravenous dose of 1.5 g cefuroxime (Zinacef; GlaxoSmithKline, London) administered before insertion of the PEG tube.>Main outcome measure Primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically evident wound infection within 14 days after insertion of the PEG catheter. Secondary outcomes were positive bacterial culture and blood tests (highly sensitive C reactive protein and white blood cell count). All randomised patients were included in an intention to treat analysis.>Results Of the 234 patients included in this study, 116 were randomly assigned to co-trimoxazole and 118 to cefuroxime. At follow-up 7-14 days after insertion of the PEG catheter, wound infection was found in 10 (8.6%) patients in the co-trimoxazole group and 14 (11.9%) in the cefuroxime group, which corresponds to a percentage point difference of −3.3% (95% confidence interval −10.9% to 4.5%). The per protocol analysis, which comprised 100 patients in each group, gave similar results—10% and 13% infection in the co-trimoxazole and cefuroxime groups, respectively (percentage point difference −3.0%, 95% CI −11.8% to 5.8%). Both these analyses indicate non-inferiority of co-trimoxazole compared with cefuroxime because the upper bounds of the confidence intervals are lower than the pre-determined non-inferiority margin of 15%. Analyses of the secondary outcomes supported this finding.>Conclusion 20 ml of co-trimoxazole solution deposited in a newly inserted PEG catheter is at least as effective as cefuroxime prophylaxis given intravenously before PEG at preventing wound infections in patients undergoing PEG.>Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18677736.
机译:>目的,以评估在经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)中预防抗生素的新方法和简单策略。>设计单中心,两臂,随机,对照,双盲临床试验。在2005年6月3日至2009年10月31日期间于瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡大学医院的strong> Setting 内窥镜检查科。>参与者 234名有PEG适应症的患者表示愿意参加。 strong>干预插入后立即将20 ml剂量的磺胺甲恶唑和甲氧苄啶口服溶液(也称为co-trimoxazole或Bactrim; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd,瑞士巴塞尔)沉积在PEG导管中。对照组接受的预防措施包括在插入PEG管之前单次静脉注射1.5 g头孢呋辛(Zinacef; GlaxoSmithKline,London)。>主要结局指标:主要结局是出现临床上明显的伤口插入PEG导管后14天内感染。次要结果是阳性细菌培养和血液检查(高度敏感的C反应蛋白和白细胞计数)。 >结果本研究纳入的234例患者中,有116例被随机分配给co-trimoxazole,118例被分配给头孢呋辛。插入PEG导管后的7-14天随访中,复方新诺明组10例(8.6%)患者和头孢呋辛组14例(11.9%)患者发现伤口感染,这相差一个百分点-3.3%(95%置信区间-10.9%至4.5%)。按方案分析,每组包括100名患者,得出相似的结果-复方新诺明和头孢呋辛组的感染率分别为10%和13%(点差-3.0%,95%CI -11.8%至5.8% )。这两个分析均表明,与头孢呋辛相比,复方新诺明的非劣性是因为置信区间的上限低于预定的非劣性裕度15%。对次要结果的分析支持了这一发现。>结论在新插入的PEG导管中沉积20 ml的复方新诺明溶液至少与在PEG注射前静脉注射头孢呋辛预防的效果相同,以预防患者PEG。>试验注册当前受控试验为ISRCTN18677736。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号