首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Group art therapy as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia: multicentre pragmatic randomised trial
【2h】

Group art therapy as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia: multicentre pragmatic randomised trial

机译:团体艺术疗法作为精神分裂症患者的辅助治疗:多中心语用随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of group art therapy for people with schizophrenia and to test whether any benefits exceed those of an active control treatment.>Design Three arm, rater blinded, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. >Setting Secondary care services across 15 sites in the United Kingdom.>Participants 417 people aged 18 or over, who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and provided written informed consent to take part in the study.>Interventions Participants, stratified by site, were randomised to 12 months of weekly group art therapy plus standard care, 12 months of weekly activity groups plus standard care, or standard care alone. Art therapy and activity groups had up to eight members and lasted for 90 minutes. In art therapy, members were given access to a range of art materials and encouraged to use these to express themselves freely. Members of activity groups were offered various activities that did not involve use of art or craft materials and were encouraged to collectively select those they wanted to pursue.>Main outcome measures The primary outcomes were global functioning, measured using the global assessment of functioning scale, and mental health symptoms, measured using the positive and negative syndrome scale, 24 months after randomisation. Main secondary outcomes were levels of group attendance, social functioning, and satisfaction with care at 12 and 24 months.>Results 417 participants were assigned to either art therapy (n=140), activity groups (n=140), or standard care alone (n=137). Primary outcomes between the three study arms did not differ. The adjusted mean difference between art therapy and standard care at 24 months on the global assessment of functioning scale was −0.9 (95% confidence interval −3.8 to 2.1), and on the positive and negative syndrome scale was 0.7 (−3.1 to 4.6). Secondary outcomes did not differ between those referred to art therapy or those referred to standard care at 12 or 24 months.>Conclusions Referring people with established schizophrenia to group art therapy as delivered in this trial did not improve global functioning, mental health, or other health related outcomes.>Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46150447.
机译:>目标:评估集体艺术疗法对精神分裂症患者的临床疗效,并测试是否有任何益处超过主动控制疗法。>设计三臂评估者盲目,务实,随机对照试验。 >设置英国境内15个站点的二级保健服务。>参与者有417岁或18岁以上,诊断为精神分裂症并提供知情同意书的人可以参加>干预:按部位分层的参与者被随机分为每周12个月的每周一次艺术治疗加标准治疗,每周12个月的每周活动组加标准治疗或单独进行标准治疗。艺术治疗和活动小组最多有八名成员,历时90分钟。在艺术疗法中,成员可以使用多种艺术材料,并鼓励他们使用这些材料自由表达自己。向活动组的成员提供了各种活动,这些活动不涉及使用艺术或手工艺材料,并被鼓励集体选择他们想要追求的活动。>主要成果衡量指标,主要成果是全球职能,使用随机分组后24个月,使用阳性和阴性综合征量表对功能量表和心理健康症状进行总体评估。主要的次要结局指标是小组出勤,社交功能和对护理的满意程度,分别为12和24个月。>结果将417名参与者分配到任一艺术疗法(n = 140),活动组(n = 140) )或仅标准护理(n = 137)。三个研究部门之间的主要结局没有差异。在功能量表的总体评估中,艺术疗法与标准护理在24个月时的调整后平均差为-0.9(95%置信区间-3.8至2.1),在阳性和阴性综合征量表上为0.7(-3.1至4.6) 。在12或24个月时,接受艺术疗法的患者或接受标准护理的患者的次要结局没有差异。>结论在该试验中,将已建立精神分裂症的患者转介接受艺术疗法分组并不能改善整体功能,心理健康或其他与健康相关的结局。>试验注册当前的对照试验ISRCTN46150447。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号