首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre rater blinded randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
【2h】

Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre rater blinded randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)

机译:心理社会干预对轻度阿尔茨海默氏病患者的疗效:多中心评估者盲目随机的丹麦阿尔茨海默氏症干预研究(DAISY)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To assess the efficacy at 12 months of an early psychosocial counselling and support programme for outpatients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their primary care givers.>Design Multicentre, randomised, controlled, rater blinded trial.>Setting Primary care and memory clinics in five Danish districts.>Participants 330 outpatients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their 330 primary care givers.>Interventions Participating dyads (patient and primary care giver) were randomised to control support during follow-up or to control support plus DAISY intervention (multifaceted and semi-tailored counselling, education, and support).>Main outcome measures Primary outcomes at 12 months for patients were change from baseline in mini mental state examination (MMSE) score, Cornell depression scale score, and proxy rated European quality of life visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) score. For care givers, outcomes were change from baseline in geriatric depression scale (GDS 30 items) score and EQ-VAS score.>Results Because of multiple testing, statistical significance was set at an adjusted P limit of <0.0005. At 12 months there were no significant differences between the two allocation groups in changes from baseline in the primary and secondary outcomes. However, although non-significant with the adjusted P limit, a small difference was observed for one of the primary patient outcomes (Cornell depression scale score) in patients in favour of the DAISY intervention group before and after adjusting for attrition (P=0.0146 and P=0.0103 respectively).>Conclusions The multifaceted, semi-tailored intervention with counselling, education, and support for patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their care givers did not have any significant effect beyond that with well structured follow-up support at 12 months after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The small positive effect found in the unadjusted primary outcome addressing depressive symptoms in patients may call for further research focusing on patients with Alzheimer’s disease and comorbid depression.>Trial registration ISRCTN74848736.
机译:>目的,以评估针对轻度阿尔茨海默氏病患者及其初级护理人员的早期社会心理咨询和支持计划在12个月时的疗效。>设计多中心,随机,对照,评估者>设置位于丹麦五个地区的初级保健和记忆诊所。>参与者 330名轻度阿尔茨海默氏病门诊患者及其330名初级护理人员。>干预参与的二联体(患者和基层护理提供者)被随机分配以在随访期间控制支持或控制支持加DAISY干预(多方面和半定制的咨询,教育和支持)。>主要结局指标患者在12个月时的预后与迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评分,康奈尔抑郁量表评分和代理人评定的欧洲生活质量视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)得分相比有所变化。对于护理人员,结果与老年抑郁量表(GDS 30个项)得分和EQ-VAS得分的基线值相比有所变化。>结果由于进行了多次测试,统计学上的显着性被设置为调整后的P限值<0.0005 。在12个月时,两个分配组之间主要和次要结局的基线变化无明显差异。然而,尽管调整后的P极限值不显着,但在调整损耗之前和之后,有利于DAISY干预组的主要患者结果之一(康奈尔抑郁量表评分)差异很小(P = 0.0146和分别为P = 0.0103)。调整后12个月提供向上支持,以进行多次比较。在未调整的主要结局指标中发现的解决患者抑郁症状的积极作用较小,可能需要针对阿尔茨海默氏病和合并症的患者进行进一步研究。>试验注册 ISRCTN74848736。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号