首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Association of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and all cause mortality in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: retrospective cohort study
【2h】

Association of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and all cause mortality in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: retrospective cohort study

机译:收缩压和舒张压的关联以及所有新诊断的2型糖尿病患者的死亡率:回顾性队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Objective To examine the effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure achieved in the first year of treatment on all cause mortality in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, with and without established cardiovascular disease.>Design Retrospective cohort study.>Setting United Kingdom General Practice Research Database, between 1990 and 2005.>Participants 126 092 adult patients (age ≥18 years) with a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes who had been registered with participating practices for at least 12 months.>Main outcome measure All cause mortality.>Results Before diagnosis, 12 379 (9.8%) patients had established cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction or stroke). During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, we recorded 25 495 (20.2%) deaths. In people with cardiovascular disease, tight control of systolic (<130 mm Hg) and diastolic (<80 mm Hg) blood pressure was not associated with improved survival, after adjustment for baseline characteristics (age at diagnosis, sex, practice level clustering, deprivation score, body mass index, smoking, HbA1c and cholesterol levels, and blood pressure). Low blood pressure was also associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality. Compared with patients who received usual control of systolic blood pressure (130-139 mm Hg), the hazard ratio of all cause mortality was 2.79 (95% confidence interval 1.74 to 4.48, P<0.001) for systolic blood pressure at 110 mm Hg. Compared with patients who received usual control of diastolic blood pressure (80-84 mm Hg), the hazard ratios were 1.32 (1.02 to 1.78, P=0.04) and 1.89 (1.40 to 2.56, P<0.001) for diastolic blood pressures at 70-74 mm Hg and lower than 70 mm Hg, respectively. Similar associations were found in people without cardiovascular disease. Subgroup analyses of people diagnosed with hypertension and who received treatment for hypertension confirmed initial findings.>Conclusion Blood pressure below 130/80 mm Hg was not associated with reduced risk of all cause mortality in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, with or without known cardiovascular disease. Low blood pressure, particularly below 110/75 mm Hg, was associated with an increased risk for poor outcomes.
机译:>目的研究了在治疗的第一年中达到的收缩压和舒张压对新诊断为2型糖尿病,有无心血管疾病的患者全因死亡率的影响。>设计< / strong>回顾性队列研究。>设置英国全科医学研究数据库,1990年至2005年。>参与者 126 092例新诊断为成年的18岁以上成人患者已在参与实践中注册至少12个月的2型糖尿病。>主要结果指标所有原因导致的死亡率。>结果在诊断之前,已确定12 379(9.8%)患者心血管疾病(心肌梗塞或中风)。在3.5年的中位随访期间,我们记录了25-495人(20.2%)的死亡。在患有心血管疾病的人中,在调整基线特征(诊断时的年龄,性别,练习水平聚类,剥夺)后,严格控制收缩压(<130 mm Hg)和舒张压(<80 mm Hg)与存活率没有改善。得分,体重指数,吸烟,HbA1c和胆固醇水平以及血压)。血压低也与所有原因死亡的风险增加有关。与接受通常控制的收缩压(130-139 mm Hg)的患者相比,在110 mm Hg的收缩压下,所有原因死亡的危险比是2.79(95%置信区间1.74至4.48,P <0.001)。与通常控制舒张压(80-84 mm Hg)的患者相比,舒张压在70岁时的危险比为1.32(1.02至1.78,P = 0.04)和1.89(1.40至2.56,P <0.001) -74 mm Hg和低于70 mm Hg。在没有心血管疾病的人中也发现了类似的关联。对确诊为高血压的人和接受过高血压治疗的人进行的亚组分析证实了最初的发现。>结论血压低于130/80 mm Hg与降低新诊断的糖尿病患者全因死亡率的风险无关,有或没有已知的心血管疾病。血压低,特别是低于110/75毫米汞柱,会增加不良预后的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号