首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Improving antibiotic prescribing in acute respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial from Norwegian general practice (prescription peer academic detailing (Rx-PAD) study)
【2h】

Improving antibiotic prescribing in acute respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial from Norwegian general practice (prescription peer academic detailing (Rx-PAD) study)

机译:改善急性呼吸道感染中的抗生素处方:来自挪威普通实践的整群随机试验(处方同伴学术研究(Rx-PAD)研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To assess the effects of a multifaceted educational intervention in Norwegian general practice aiming to reduce antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections and to reduce the use of broad spectrum antibiotics.>Design Cluster randomised controlled study.>Setting Existing continuing medical education groups were recruited and randomised to intervention or control.>Participants 79 groups, comprising 382 general practitioners, completed the interventions and data extractions.>Interventions The intervention groups had two visits by peer academic detailers, the first presenting the national clinical guidelines for antibiotic use and recent research evidence on acute respiratory tract infections, the second based on feedback reports on each general practitioner’s antibiotic prescribing profile from the preceding year. Regional one day seminars were arranged as a supplement. The control arm received a different intervention targeting prescribing practice for older patients.>Main outcome measures Prescription rates and proportion of non-penicillin V antibiotics prescribed at the group level before and after the intervention, compared with corresponding data from the controls.>Results In an adjusted, multilevel model, the effect of the intervention on the 39 intervention groups (183 general practitioners) was a reduction (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.84) in prescribing of antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections compared with the controls (40 continuing medical education groups with 199 general practitioners). A corresponding reduction was seen in the odds (0.64, 0.49 to 0.82) for prescribing a non-penicillin V antibiotic when an antibiotic was issued. Prescriptions per 1000 listed patients increased from 80.3 to 84.6 in the intervention arm and from 80.9 to 89.0 in the control arm, but this reflects a greater incidence of infections (particularly pneumonia) that needed treating in the intervention arm.>Conclusions The intervention led to improved antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in a representative sample of Norwegian general practitioners, and the courses were feasible to the general practitioners.>Trial registration Clinical trials .
机译:>目的:评估旨在降低急性呼吸道感染的抗生素处方率并减少广谱抗生素使用的挪威普通实践中多方面教育干预的效果。>设计整群随机对照研究。>设置招募现有的继续医学教育组,并随机分为干预或对照组。>参与者由382名全科医生组成的79组完成了干预和数据提取。 >干预:干预小组进行了两次学术同行访问,第一次介绍了国家抗生素使用临床指南以及有关急性呼吸道感染的最新研究证据,第二次基于对每位全科医生抗生素的反馈报告规定上一年的资料。安排了区域性一日研讨班作为补充。对照组接受了针对老年患者的处方操作的不同干预措施。>主要结局指标干预前后在组水平上处方的非青霉素V抗生素处方率和比例,与来自>结果。在经过调整的多层次模型中,该干预措施对39个干预组(183名全科医生)的作用降低了(优势比0.72,95%置信区间0.61至0.84)。与对照相比(40个继续医学教育组,包括199名全科医生)开具针对急性呼吸道感染的抗生素处方。签发抗生素时开出非青霉素V抗生素的几率相应降低(0.64,0.49至0.82)。干预组每1000名列出患者的处方从80.3增加到84.6,对照组从80.9增加到89.0,但这反映出需要干预组治疗的感染(尤其是肺炎)的发生率更高。>结论 strong>该干预措施在挪威全科医生的代表性样本中改善了对呼吸道感染的抗生素处方,这些课程对全科医生是可行的。>试验注册临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号