首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Disease activity guided dose reduction and withdrawal of adalimumab or etanercept compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthritis: open label randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
【2h】

Disease activity guided dose reduction and withdrawal of adalimumab or etanercept compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthritis: open label randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

机译:与类风湿关节炎的常规治疗相比疾病活动指导的阿达木单抗或依那西普的剂量减少和停用:开放标签随机对照非劣效性试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To evaluate whether a disease activity guided strategy of dose reduction of two tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, adalimumab or etanercept, is non-inferior in maintaining disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with usual care.>Design Randomised controlled, open label, non-inferiority strategy trial.>Setting Two rheumatology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands, from December 2011 to May 2014.>Participants 180 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low disease activity using adalimumab or etanercept; 121 allocated to the dose reduction strategy, 59 to usual care.>Interventions Disease activity guided dose reduction (advice to stepwise increase the injection interval every three months, until flare of disease activity or discontinuation) or usual care (no dose reduction advice). Flare was defined as increase in DAS28-CRP (a composite score measuring disease activity) greater than 1.2, or increase greater than 0.6 and current score of at least 3.2. In the case of flare, TNF inhibitor use was restarted or escalated.>Main outcome measures Difference in proportions of patients with major flare (DAS28-CRP based flare longer than three months) between the two groups at 18 months, compared against a non-inferiority margin of 20%. Secondary outcomes included TNF inhibitor use at study end, functioning, quality of life, radiographic progression, and adverse events.>Results Dose reduction of adalimumab or etanercept was non-inferior to usual care (proportion of patients with major flare at 18 months, 12% v 10%; difference 2%, 95% confidence interval −12% to 12%). In the dose reduction group, TNF inhibitor use could successfully be stopped in 20% (95% confidence interval 13% to 28%), the injection interval successfully increased in 43% (34% to 53%), but no dose reduction was possible in 37% (28% to 46%). Functional status, quality of life, relevant radiographic progression, and adverse events did not differ between the groups, although short lived flares (73% v 27%) and minimal radiographic progression (32% v 15%) were more frequent in dose reduction than usual care.>Conclusions A disease activity guided, dose reduction strategy of adalimumab or etanercept to treat rheumatoid arthritis is non-inferior to usual care with regard to major flaring, while resulting in the successful dose reduction or stopping in two thirds of patients.>Trial registration Dutch trial register (), NTR 3216.
机译:>目的:与常规治疗相比,评估两种肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂阿达木单抗或依那西普的疾病活动指导策略在维持疾病控制方面是否不劣于风湿关节炎。>设计随机对照,开放标签,非劣效性策略试验。>设置:2011年12月至2014年5月在荷兰开设的两家风湿病门诊。>参与者干预疾病活动指导减少剂量(建议每三个月逐步增加注射间隔,直到疾病活跃或中断发作)或常规治疗(没有减少剂量的建议)。耀斑定义为DAS28-CRP的增加(测量疾病活动性的综合评分)大于1.2,或大于0.6且当前评分至少为3.2。在爆发情况下,TNF抑制剂的使用重新开始或逐步增加。>主要结局指标两组在18个月时主要爆发(基于DAS28-CRP的爆发超过三个月)的患者比例差异,而非劣质性利润率为20%。次要结果包括研究结束时使用TNF抑制剂,功能,生活质量,影像学进展和不良事件。>结果降低阿达木单抗或依那西普的剂量并不逊于常规治疗(占重症患者的比例) 18个月时爆发,12%对10%;差异2%,95%置信区间-12%至12%)。在减量组中,可以成功地以20%(95%置信区间13%至28%)停止使用TNF抑制剂,成功地将注射间隔增加43%(34%至53%),但不能降低剂量占37%(28%至46%)。两组之间的功能状态,生活质量,相关的放射学进展和不良事件之间没有差异,尽管短暂的耀斑(73%vs 27%)和放射学进展最少(32%vs 15%)的剂量减少比>结论:根据疾病活动指导的阿达木单抗或依那西普的剂量减少策略来治疗类风湿性关节炎,在大张开方面并不逊色于常规治疗,而是成功地降低了剂量或停止了常规治疗。三分之二的患者。>试验注册荷兰试验注册(),NTR 3216。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号