首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Patient choice in opt-in active choice and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
【2h】

Patient choice in opt-in active choice and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial

机译:选择加入主动选择和选择退出HIV筛查的患者选择:随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Study question What is the effect of default test offers—opt-in, opt-out, and active choice—on the likelihood of acceptance of an HIV test among patients receiving care in an emergency department?>Methods This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the emergency department of an urban teaching hospital and regional trauma center. Patients aged 13-64 years were randomized to opt-in, opt-out, and active choice HIV test offers. The primary outcome was HIV test acceptance percentage. The Denver Risk Score was used to categorize patients as being at low, intermediate, or high risk of HIV infection.>Study answer and limitations 38.0% (611/1607) of patients in the opt-in testing group accepted an HIV test, compared with 51.3% (815/1628) in the active choice arm (difference 13.3%, 95% confidence interval 9.8% to 16.7%) and 65.9% (1031/1565) in the opt-out arm (difference 27.9%, 24.4% to 31.3%). Compared with active choice testing, opt-out testing led to a 14.6 (11.1 to 18.1) percentage point increase in test acceptance. Patients identified as being at intermediate and high risk were more likely to accept testing than were those at low risk in all arms (difference 6.4% (3.4% to 9.3%) for intermediate and 8.3% (3.3% to 13.4%) for high risk). The opt-out effect was significantly smaller among those reporting high risk behaviors, but the active choice effect did not significantly vary by level of reported risk behavior. Patients consented to inclusion in the study after being offered an HIV test, and inclusion varied slightly by treatment assignment. The study took place at a single county hospital in a city that is somewhat unique with respect to HIV testing; although the test acceptance percentages themselves might vary, a different pattern for opt-in versus active choice versus opt-out test schemes would not be expected.>What this paper adds Active choice is a distinct test regimen, with test acceptance patterns that may best approximate patients’ true preferences. Opt-out regimens can substantially increase HIV testing, and opt-in schemes may reduce testing, compared with active choice testing.>Funding, competing interests, data sharing This study was supported by grant NIA 1RC4AG039078 from the National Institute on Aging. The full dataset is available from the corresponding author. Consent for data sharing was not obtained, but the data are anonymized and risk of identification is low.>Trial registration Clinical trials .
机译:>研究问题:默认测试选项(选择加入,选择退出和主动选择)对急诊科接受治疗的患者接受HIV测试的可能性有什么影响? >方法。这是在城市教学医院和区域创伤中心的急诊室进行的一项随机临床试验。将13-64岁的患者随机分为接受,退出和主动选择HIV测试项目。主要结果是艾滋病毒检测的接受率。丹佛风险评分用于对处于HIV感染低,中或高风险的患者进行分类。>研究答案和局限性参加测试的患者占38.0%(611/1607)接受了HIV检测,主动选择组中的差异为51.3%(815/1628)(差异为13.3%,置信区间为95%,9.8%至16.7%),而选择退出组的差异为65.9%(1031/1565)(差异27.9%,24.4%至31.3%)。与主动选择测试相比,退出测试导致测试接受度提高了14.6(11.1至18.1)个百分点。与所有组中低风险患者相比,被鉴定为中风险和高风险的患者更有可能接受检查(中风险差异为6.4%(3.4%至9.3%),高风险差异为8.3%(3.3%至13.4%) )。在那些报告高风险行为的人中,选择退出效应明显较小,但主动选择效应并未随所报告的风险行为水平而显着变化。患者接受了HIV检测后同意纳入研究,并且因治疗分配而有所不同。这项研究是在一个城市的一家县医院进行的,该医院在艾滋病毒检测方面有些独特。尽管测试接受百分比本身可能会有所不同,但选择加入测试,主动选择测试和退出选择测试方案的模式不同。>本文添加的内容:主动选择是一种独特的测试方案,可以最接近患者真实偏好的测试接受方式。与主动选择测试相比,选择退出方案可以大大增加HIV检测,选择加入方案可以减少测试。>资金,竞争利益,数据共享该研究得到了美国国家科学研究院(NIA)的NIA 1RC4AG039078资助衰老研究所。完整的数据集可从相应的作者处获得。未获得数据共享的同意,但数据被匿名化并且识别风险低。>试验注册临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号