首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Waiting list statistics. III. Comparison of two measures of waiting times.
【2h】

Waiting list statistics. III. Comparison of two measures of waiting times.

机译:等待列表统计信息。三比较两种衡量等待时间的方法。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The length of time that patients spend on waiting lists is a topic of current concern. Calculating the proportion of patients who have been on a waiting list for a long time by taking a census of patients on the list at a single point in time will tend to yield a higher estimate than that obtained by calculating waiting times of patients admitted to hospital during a period of time. To illustrate this point the waiting times of patients in the Oxford region as measured by SBH 203 returns ("census" data) were compared with those as measured by the Hospital Activity Analysis ("event" data). As expected, the SBH 203 census returns showed a higher proportion of patients who had waited over a year compared with the "event" measure of all admissions. This difference, which is analagous to the difference between prevalence and incidence in epidemiology, should be considered when using data from these sources to calculate waiting times.
机译:患者在等待名单上花费的时间长短是当前关注的话题。通过在单个时间点对名单上的患者进行普查来计算长期等待名单上的患者比例,往往会得出比通过计算住院患者的等待时间得出的估计值更高的估计值在一段时间内。为了说明这一点,将通过SBH 203申报表(“普查”数据)测量的牛津地区患者的等待时间与通过医院活动分析(“事件”数据)测量的等待时间进行了比较。与预期的一样,SBH 203人口普查报告显示,与所有入院的“事件”度量相比,等待了一年以上的患者比例更高。在使用来自这些来源的数据来计算等待时间时,应考虑这种差异,这与流行病学的患病率和发病率之间的差异类似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号