首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Venereal Diseases >Estimating the costs and benefits of screening monogamous heterosexual couples for unrecognised infection with herpes simplex virus type 2
【2h】

Estimating the costs and benefits of screening monogamous heterosexual couples for unrecognised infection with herpes simplex virus type 2

机译:估算筛查一夫一妻制异性恋夫妇未发现的2型单纯疱疹病毒感染的成本和收益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is the most common cause of ulcerative genital disease in the United States, but infection is commonly unrecognised. Serological screening tests could identify discordantly infected couples and permit targeted interventions to limit HSV-2 transmission. Our objective was to evaluate the projected cost effectiveness of strategies to prevent HSV-2 transmission in couples with no history of HSV-2 infection. >Methods: We created a mathematical model to simulate the natural history and costs of HSV-2 transmission, and the expected impact of HSV-2 prevention strategies in monogamous, heterosexual couples. Strategies evaluated included (i) no screening; (ii) universal condom use; and (iii) serological screening for HSV-2 with condom use targeted to discordant couples. Screening tests considered included western blot (WB), ELISA, and ELISA with confirmation of positive test results using WB (ELISA→WB). >Results: Compared to no screening, the use of ELISA→WB prevented 38 future infections per 1000 couples, with a cost effectiveness ratio of $8200 per infection averted. The use of WB in all couples had an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $63 600 per infection averted. Strategies of ELISA alone and universal condom use were not cost effective. The cost effectiveness of ELISA→WB improved with increasing prevalence of HSV-2, but worsened with decreasing condom compliance. Screening with ELISA alone was a reasonable strategy only when ELISA specificity increased to 99%. >Conclusions: Serological screening for unrecognised HSV-2 infection in monogamous, heterosexual couples is expected to decrease the incidence of HSV-2 infection, but increase healthcare costs. For couples choosing to be screened, a two step testing strategy (ELISA→WB) is recommended. Recommendations for a national policy to conduct serological screening will depend on the value placed on averting an incident HSV-2 infection.
机译:>目标:2型单纯疱疹病毒(HSV-2)是美国最常见的溃疡性生殖器疾病的病因,但通常无法识别感染。血清学筛查测试可以识别出感染不和谐的夫妇,并允许有针对性的干预措施来限制HSV-2的传播。我们的目标是评估在没有HSV-2感染史的夫妻中预防HSV-2传播的策略的预期成本效益。 >方法:我们创建了一个数学模型来模拟HSV-2传播的自然史和成本,以及HSV-2预防策略对一夫一妻制,异性恋夫妇的预期影响。评估的策略包括(i)不进行筛选; (ii)普遍使用安全套; (iii)针对不和谐夫妻使用安全套进行HSV-2血清学筛查。考虑的筛选测试包括蛋白质印迹(WB),ELISA和ELISA,并使用WB确认阳性测试结果(ELISA→WB)。 >结果:与不进行筛查相比,使用ELISA→WB可以预防每1000对夫妇38例未来感染,避免了每次感染8200美元的成本效益比。在所有夫妇中使用WB,避免了每次感染增加的成本效益比63600美元。单独使用ELISA和普遍使用安全套的策略并不划算。 ELISA→WB的成本效益随着HSV-2患病率的提高而提高,但随着避孕套顺应性的降低而降低。仅当ELISA特异性提高到99%时,单独进行ELISA筛选才是合理的策略。 >结论:对一夫一妻制,异性恋夫妇进行无法识别的HSV-2感染的血清学筛查,有望减少HSV-2感染的发生率,但会增加医疗费用。对于选择进行筛选的夫妇,建议采用两步测试策略(ELISA→WB)。有关进行血清学筛查的国家政策的建议,将取决于避免发生HSV-2感染的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号