首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Preventive Social Medicine >Profits before people? A systematic review of the health and safety impacts of privatising public utilities and industries in developed countries
【2h】

Profits before people? A systematic review of the health and safety impacts of privatising public utilities and industries in developed countries

机译:人们面前的利润?对发达国家公用事业和工业私有化对健康和安全的影响进行系统回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Debates on government privatisation policies have often focused on the alleged effects of privatisation on health and safety. A systematic review (through Quality of Reporting of Meta‐analysis) of the effects of privatising industries and utilities on the health (including injuries) of employees and the public was conducted. The data sources were electronic databases (medical, social science and economic), bibliographies and expert contacts. Experimental and quasi‐experimental studies were sought, dating from 1945, from any Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development member country (in any language) that evaluated the health outcomes of such interventions. Eleven highly heterogeneous studies that evaluated the health impacts of privatisation of building, water, paper, cement, bus, rail, mining, electric and gas companies were identified. The most robust study found increases in the measures of stress‐related ill health among employees after a privatisation intervention involving company downsizing. No robust evidence was found to link privatisation with increased injury rates for employees or customers. In conclusion, public debates on the health and safety implications of privatisation have a poor empirical base, which policy makers and researchers need to address. Some evidence suggests that adverse health outcomes could result from redundancies associated with privatisation.
机译:关于政府私有化政策的辩论通常集中在所谓的私有化对健康和安全的影响上。对行业和公用事业私有化对员工和公众健康(包括伤害)的影响进行了系统的评估(通过元分析报告质量)。数据来源是电子数据库(医学,社会科学和经济),书目和专家联系人。寻求任何经济合作与发展组织成员国(以任何语言进行评估)的始于1945年的实验和准实验研究,以评估此类干预措施的健康结果。确定了11项高度异类的研究,这些研究评估了建筑,水,纸张,水泥,公共汽车,铁路,采矿,电力和天然气公司私有化对健康的影响。一项最有力的研究发现,在涉及公司规模缩小的私有化干预之后,员工中与压力有关的不良健康措施有所增加。没有可靠的证据将私有化与员工或客户受伤率增加联系起来。总之,关于私有化对健康和安全的影响的公开辩论缺乏经验基础,政策制定者和研究人员需要解决这些问题。一些证据表明,与私有化相关的裁员可能导致不良的健康结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号