首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Pharmacology >Do Cross-National and Ethnic Group Bullying Comparisons Represent Reality? Testing Instruments for Structural Equivalence and Structural Isomorphism
【2h】

Do Cross-National and Ethnic Group Bullying Comparisons Represent Reality? Testing Instruments for Structural Equivalence and Structural Isomorphism

机译:跨国和族裔欺凌比较代表现实吗?结构等效性和同构性测试仪器

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bullying in schools is a widespread phenomenon, witnessed worldwide, with negative consequences for victims and perpetrators. Although it is an international issue, there are several issues with cross-national and cross-cultural/ethnic research that can make comparisons between countries and cultures/ethnic groups difficult including language, cultural perception, and/or methodological issues. As statistical techniques rapidly develop, there may be more scope to be statistically creative in how we assess the utility of one tool across different groups such as cultures, nations, etc. At the very least, an attempt to do this should be paramount in studies investigating different groups (e.g., from different countries) at one time. This study investigated bullying and victimization rates in a large cross-ethnic and -country comparison between adolescents from four countries and five different ethnic groups including: Israel (Jewish Israelis and Arab Palestinian Israelis), Palestine (the Gaza Strip), Germany, and Greece. A total of 3,186 school children aged 12–15 years completed self-report questionnaires of peer bullying/victimization. A stepwise data analytic approach was used to test comparability of the psychometric properties: (1) Structural equivalence contributes to the valid use of the instrument in cultural contexts other than the one for which the instrument has been developed. Structural equivalence is a necessary condition for the justification of indirect or direct comparisons between cultural groups. (2) Additionally, structural isomorphism is necessary to demonstrate that the same internal structure of the instrument applies to the cultural and individual levels. Findings support the internal structural equivalence of the questionnaire with the exception of the Palestinian sample from the Gaza Strip. Subsequently, exploratory factor analysis on the cultural level structure revealed a one-factor structure with congruence measure below 0.85. Thus, no evidence was found for internal structural isomorphism suggesting that no direct comparisons of cultural samples was justified. These results are discussed in detail and the implications for the international research community and cross-national/-ethnic comparison studies in bullying are addressed.
机译:在学校欺凌是一种普遍现象,在世界范围内都有目睹,给受害者和犯罪者带来负面影响。尽管这是一个国际问题,但跨国和跨文化/种族研究存在多个问题,这可能会使国家与文化/族裔群体之间的比较变得困难,包括语言,文化观念和/或方法论问题。随着统计技术的迅速发展,在我们如何评估一种工具在不同群体(例如文化,国家等)中的实用性方面,在统计上可能会有更大的创新空间。至少,在研究中尝试做到这一点至关重要一次调查不同的群体(例如,来自不同国家的群体)。这项研究在来自四个国家和五个不同种族群体的青少年之间的大型跨种族和国家比较中,调查了欺凌和受害率,这些青少年包括以色列(犹太以色列人和阿拉伯巴勒斯坦以色列人),巴勒斯坦(加沙地带),德国和希腊。共有3186名12-15岁的小学生完成了对同伴欺凌/受害的自我报告调查表。逐步数据分析方法用于测试心理计量学特性的可比性:(1)结构等效性有助于在文化背景下有效使用该工具,而不是针对该工具而开发的工具。结构对等是证明文化群体之间间接或直接比较的必要条件。 (2)另外,结构同构是必要的,以证明该乐器的相同内部结构适用于文化和个人层面。除加沙地带的巴勒斯坦样本外,调查结果支持问卷的内部结构等效。随后,对文化水平结构的探索性因素分析显示出一个全因结构低于0.85的单因素结构。因此,没有发现内部结构同构的证据表明没有直接比较文化样品的理由。详细讨论了这些结果,并探讨了国际研究界和跨国/种族比较研究在欺凌中的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号