首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Heart Journal >Acute improvement of atrial mechanical stunning after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison between biatrial and single atrial pacing
【2h】

Acute improvement of atrial mechanical stunning after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison between biatrial and single atrial pacing

机译:持续性心房颤动电复律后房性机械性惊厥的急性改善:双心房和单心房起搏的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the acute effects of atrial pacing at different pacing sites on mechanical stunning after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF).Setting: Tertiary referral centre.Patients: 20 patients with persistent AF were studied.Interventions: Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAEV), and left atrial appendage emptying fraction (LAAEF) were assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) during AF, after conversion to sinus rhythm, and during atrial pacing from the right atrial appendage, left lateral atrium, and both atria simultaneously. Transmitral inflow velocity of the atrial wave (TMIF-A) by TOE and the maximum P wave duration in 12 lead ECG were also measured during sinus rhythm and atrial pacing.Main outcome measures: Comparison of atrial mechanical function and P wave duration in 12 lead ECG during atrial pacing from different sites after cardioversion of AF.Results: Compared with sinus rhythm, atrial pacing at 80 beats/min increased LAAEV from mean (SD) 14.6 (10.1) to 33.4 (19.8) cm/s (p  =  0.001), LAAEF from 13.8 (8.5) to 32.1 (11.2)% (p < 0.001), and TMIF-A from 24.6 (11.9) to 45.6 (21.0) cm/s (p < 0.001) and reduced SEC grade from 2.6 (1.0) to 1.6 (0.9) (p < 0.001). These effects had a positive force–frequency relation. Biatrial pacing produced the shortest P wave duration and resulted in the most significant improvement in atrial function (LAAEV, 33.2 (19.3) v 53.7 (23.9) cm/s, p  =  0.0001; LAAEF, 31.9 (11.1) v 46.2 (12.6)%, p < 0.0001; TMIF-A, 37.7 (18.3) v 54.1 (21.2) cm/s, p < 0.001; SEC grade, 1.4 (1.1) v 0.8 (0.9), p  =  0.001, right atrial appendage versus biatrial pacing).Conclusions: Atrial pacing at increased rates can improve atrial mechanical function after cardioversion of persistent AF. Biatrial pacing may be the most effective technique to reverse atrial mechanical stunning.
机译:目的:评估心房起搏(AF)心脏复律后不同起搏部位的心房起搏对机械性电击的急性影响。设置:三级转诊中心。患者:研究了20例持续性AF患者。干预措施:通过以下方法评估自发性回声对比(SEC),左心耳排空速度(LAAEV)和左心耳排空分数(LAAEF)经食道超声心动图(TOE)在房颤期间,转换为窦性心律后以及在从右心耳,左心房和两个心房同时起搏的心房起搏期间。在窦性心律和心房起搏期间,还测量了TOE传导的心房传导波速度(TMIF-A)和12导联心电图的最大P波持续时间。主要结果指标:心房机械功能的比较心房颤动复律后不同部位起搏时12导联心电图的P波和P波持续时间。结果:与窦性心律相比,以80次搏动/分钟的心律起搏使LAAEV从平均(SD)升高14.6(10.1) )至33.4(19.8)cm / s(p = 0.001),LAAEF从13.8(8.5)到32.1(11.2)%(p <0.001)和TMIF-A从24.6(11.9)到45.6(21.0)cm / s (p <0.001),并将SEC评分从2.6(1.0)降低至1.6(0.9)(p <0.001)。这些影响具有正的力-频率关系。儿科起搏产生最短的P波持续时间,并导致房功能显着改善(LAAEV,33.2(19.3)v 53.7(23.9)cm / s,p = 0.0001; LAAEF,31.9(11.1)v 46.2(12.6)% ,p <0.0001; TMIF-A,37.7(18.3)v 54.1(21.2)cm / s,p <0.001; SEC级,1.4(1.1)v 0.8(0.9),p = 0.001,右心耳对小儿起搏) 结论:持续性房颤复律后,提高心房起搏速度可改善心房机械功能。儿科起搏可能是逆转房颤的最有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号