首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Heart Journal >Prognostic significance of electrical alternans versus signal averaged electrocardiography in predicting the outcome of electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival
【2h】

Prognostic significance of electrical alternans versus signal averaged electrocardiography in predicting the outcome of electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival

机译:电交替素与信号平均心电图对预测电生理测试和无心律失常生存的预后意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective—To investigate the accuracy of signal averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) and measurement of microvolt level T wave alternans as predictors of susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias.
Design—Analysis of new data from a previously published prospective investigation.
Setting—Electrophysiology laboratory of a major referral hospital.
Patients and interventions—43 patients, not on class I or class III antiarrhythmic drug treatment, undergoing invasive electrophysiological testing had SAECG and T wave alternans measurements. The SAECG was considered positive in the presence of one (SAECG-I) or two (SAECG-II) of three standard criteria. T wave alternans was considered positive if the alternans ratio exceeded 3.0.
Main outcome measures—Inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation during electrophysiological testing, and 20 month arrhythmia-free survival.
Results—The accuracy of T wave alternans in predicting the outcome of electrophysiological testing was 84% (p < 0.0001). Neither SAECG-I (accuracy 60%; p < 0.29) nor SAECG-II (accuracy 71%; p < 0.10) was a statistically significant predictor of electrophysiological testing. SAECG, T wave alternans, electrophysiological testing, and follow up data were available in 36 patients while not on class I or III antiarrhythmic agents. The accuracy of T wave alternans in predicting the outcome of arrhythmia-free survival was 86% (p < 0.030). Neither SAECG-I (accuracy 65%; p < 0.21) nor SAECG-II (accuracy 71%; p < 0.48) was a statistically significant predictor of arrhythmia-free survival.
Conclusions—T wave alternans was a highly significant predictor of the outcome of electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival, while SAECG was not a statistically significant predictor. Although these results need to be confirmed in prospective clinical studies, they suggest that T wave alternans may serve as a non-invasive probe for screening high risk populations for malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

Keywords: electrophysiological testing;  electrical alternans;  signal averaged electrocardiography;  arrhythmias
机译:目的-研究信号平均心电图(SAECG)的准确性和微伏级T波交替蛋白的测量作为室性心律失常易感性的预测指标。
设计-先前发表的前瞻性研究对新数据的分析。
设置-一家大型转诊医院的电生理实验室。
患者和干预措施-接受侵入性电生理测试的43例非I类或III类抗心律不齐药物治疗的患者进行了SAECG和T波交替检测。在三个标准标准中有一个(SAECG-I)或两个(SAECG-II)的情况下,SAECG被视为阳性。如果交替波比率超过3.0,则认为T波交替波为阳性。
主要结果指标-电生理测试期间持续性室性心动过速或颤动的诱导性,以及20个月无心律失常的存活率。
结果-T波的准确性Wave Alternans预测电生理测试的结果为84%(p <0.0001)。 SAECG-I(准确度60%; p <0.29)和SAECG-II(准确度71%; p <0.10)都不是电生理测试的统计学显着指标。在没有使用I类或III类抗心律不齐药物的36例患者中可获得SAECG,T波交替蛋白,电生理测试和随访数据。 T波交替蛋白预测无心律失常生存结果的准确性为86%(p <0.030)。 SAECG-I(准确度65%; p <0.21)和SAECG-II(准确度71%; p <0.48)都不是无心律失常生存的统计学显着预测指标。
结论-T波交替蛋白是电生理测试和无心律失常生存结果的高度重要预测指标,而SAECG并不是统计学上重要的预测指标。尽管这些结果需要在前瞻性临床研究中得到证实,但它们提示T波交替蛋白可以作为筛查恶性室性心律失常高危人群的一种非侵入性探针。

电气交流信号平均心电图心律失常

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号