首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Heart Journal >Relation between symptoms and profiles of coronary artery blood flow velocities in patients with aortic valve stenosis: a study using transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography.
【2h】

Relation between symptoms and profiles of coronary artery blood flow velocities in patients with aortic valve stenosis: a study using transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography.

机译:主动脉瓣狭窄患者冠状动脉血流速度的症状与特征之间的关系:一项经食管多普勒超声心动图检查的研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To analyse profiles of coronary artery flow velocity at rest in patients with aortic stenosis and to determine whether changes of the coronary artery flow velocities are related to symptoms in patients with aortic stenosis. DESIGN: A prospective study investigating the significance of aortic valve area, pressure gradient across the aortic valve, systolic left ventricular wall stress index, ejection fraction, and left ventricular mass index in the coronary flow velocity profile of aortic stenosis; and comparing flow velocity profiles between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis using transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography to obtain coronary artery flow velocities of the left anterior descending coronary artery. SETTING: Tertiary referral cardiac centre. PATIENTS: Fifty eight patients with aortic stenosis and 15 controls with normal coronary arteries. RESULTS: Adequate recordings of the profile of coronary artery flow velocities were obtained in 46 patients (79%). Left ventricular wall stress was the only significant haemodynamic variable for determining peak systolic velocity (r = -0.83, F = 88.5, P < 0.001). The pressure gradient across the aortic valve was the only contributor for explaining peak diastolic velocity (r = 0.56, F = 20.9, P < 0.001). Controls and asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (n = 12) did not differ for peak systolic velocity [32.8 (SEM 9.7) v 27.0 (8.7) cm/s, NS] and peak diastolic velocity [58.3 (18.7) v 61.9 (13.5) cm/s, NS]. In contrast, patients with angina (n = 12) or syncope (n = 8) had lower peak systolic velocities and higher peak diastolic velocities than asymptomatic patients (P < 0.01). Peak systolic and diastolic velocities were -7.7 (22.5) cm/s and 81.7 (17.6) cm/s for patients with angina, and -19.5 (22.3) cm/s and 94.0 (20.9) cm/s for patients with syncope. Asymptomatic patients and patients with dyspnoea (n = 14) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Increased pressure gradient across the aortic valve and enhanced systolic wall stress result in characteristic changes of the profile of coronary flow velocities in patients with aortic stenosis. Decreased or reversed systolic flow velocities are compensated by enhanced diastolic flow velocities, particularly in patients with angina and syncope. This characteristic pattern of the profile of coronary artery flow velocities in patients with angina or syncope may be useful for differentiating those patients from asymptomatic patients.
机译:目的:分析主动脉瓣狭窄患者在休息时的冠状动脉流速分布,并确定冠状动脉流速的变化是否与主动脉瓣狭窄患者的症状有关。设计:一项前瞻性研究,研究主动脉瓣冠状动脉流速分布中主动脉瓣面积,主动脉瓣压力梯度,收缩期左心室壁应力指数,射血分数和左心室质量指数的重要性;经食道多普勒超声心动图比较有症状和无症状的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的流速分布,以获得左冠状动脉前降支的冠状动脉流速。地点:三级转诊心脏中心。患者:58例主动脉瓣狭窄患者和15例冠状动脉正常对照。结果:46例患者(79%)获得了足够的冠状动脉流速分布图记录。左心室壁应力是确定峰值收缩速度的唯一重要的血液动力学变量(r = -0.83,F = 88.5,P <0.001)。跨主动脉瓣的压力梯度是解释峰值舒张速度的唯一因素(r = 0.56,F = 20.9,P <0.001)。对照组和无症状主动脉瓣狭窄的患者(n = 12)的最高收缩速度[32.8(SEM 9.7)v 27.0(8.7)cm / s,NS]和最高舒张速度[58.3(18.7)v 61.9(13.5)]没有差异cm / s,NS]。相比之下,患有心绞痛(n = 12)或晕厥(n = 8)的患者的收缩期峰值速度较低,而舒张期峰值速度高于无症状患者(P <0.01)。心绞痛患者的最高收缩和舒张速度为-7.7(22.5)cm / s和81.7(17.6)cm / s,晕厥患者为-19.5(22.3)cm / s和94.0(20.9)cm / s。无症状患者和呼吸困难患者(n = 14)没有差异。结论:主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣压力梯度增加和收缩壁压力增加导致冠状动脉流速分布特征发生变化。收缩期流速的降低或逆转可通过舒张期流速的增加得到补偿,特别是在患有心绞痛和晕厥的患者中。心绞痛或晕厥患者冠状动脉流速分布的这种特征模式可能有助于将这些患者与无症状患者区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号