首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research >Analysis of the application values of different combination schemes of liquid-based cytology and high-risk human papilloma virus test in the screening of high-grade cervical lesions
【2h】

Analysis of the application values of different combination schemes of liquid-based cytology and high-risk human papilloma virus test in the screening of high-grade cervical lesions

机译:液基细胞学和高危人乳头瘤病毒试验不同组合方案在高级别宫颈病变筛查中的应用价值分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to explore the value of different combination schemes of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) test in the screening of high-grade (≥CIN 2) cervical lesions. From 5727 women who had undergone examinations with LBC and high-risk HPV test, 1884 patients with positive results of either or both LBC and HPV test were included in this study and underwent cervical biopsy. Based on the pathological examination results, comparisons of the assessment indicators of all diagnostic tests were made, and the application values of LBC and high-risk HPV test and different combination schemes of the two in the screening of high-grade (≥CIN II) cervical lesions were estimated. Compared with the single test method, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the combination scheme of LBC+HPV (with one positive result) were increased significantly (98.7% and 99.7%), but the specificity (60.8%) and accuracy rate (65.4%) dropped significantly (P<0.05). The sensitivity of LBC+HPV (with two positive results) was the lowest (80.7%), but the specificity and accuracy rate were the highest (83.5% and 83.1%, P<0.05). Z test showed that differences in the screening efficiency of four schemes were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Both LBC and HPV test were effective methods in the screening of high-grade cervical lesions; combination of the two tests did not improve the screening efficiency, but the scheme of LBC+HPV (with two positive results) significantly increased the sensitivity and negative predictive value, which was of better cost-benefit value.
机译:这项研究的目的是探索液基细胞学(LBC)和高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)测试的不同组合方案在筛查高级别(≥CIN2)宫颈病变中的价值。从5727名接受LBC和高危HPV检查的妇女中,本研究包括1884名LBC和HPV检查中一项或两项均阳性的患者,并进行了宫颈活检。根据病理检查结果,比较所有诊断检查的评估指标,并探讨LBC和高危HPV检查的应用价值,以及两者在不同级别(≥CINII)筛查中的组合方案。估计宫颈病变。与单一检测方法相比,LBC + HPV联合方案的敏感性和阴性预测值(阳性结果)显着提高(98.7%和99.7%),但特异性(60.8%)和准确率(65.4) %)显着下降(P <0.05)。 LBC + HPV的敏感性最低(有两个阳性结果)(80.7%),但特异性和准确率最高(83.5%和83.1%,P <0.05)。 Z检验显示四种方案的筛选效率差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。 LBC和HPV检测都是筛查高级别宫颈病变的有效方法。两种检测方法的结合并没有提高筛选效率,但是LBC + HPV方案(具有两个阳性结果)显着提高了灵敏度和阴性预测值,具有更好的成本效益值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号