首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The BMJ >A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke.
【2h】

A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke.

机译:急性吞咽困难中风后经皮内镜下胃造口术和鼻胃管喂养的随机前瞻性比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To compare percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. DESIGN--Randomised prospective study of inpatients with acute stroke requiring enteral nutrition. SETTING--One university hospital (Nottingham) and one district general hospital (Derby). SUBJECTS--30 patients with persisting dysphagia at 14 days after acute stroke: 16 patients were randomised to gastrostomy tube feeding and 14 to nasogastric tube feeding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Six week mortality; amount of feed administered; change in nutritional state; treatment failure; and length of hospital stay. RESULTS--Mortality at 6 weeks was significantly lower in the gastrostomy group with two deaths (12%) compared with eight deaths (57%) in the nasogastric group (P < 0.05). All gastrostomy fed patients (16) received the total prescribed feed whereas 10/14 (71%) of nasogastric patients lost at least one day's feed. Nasogastric patients received a significantly (P < 0.001) smaller proportion of their prescribed feed (78%; 95% confidence interval 63% to 94%) compared with the gastrostomy group (100%). Patients fed via a gastrostomy tube showed greater improvement in nutritional state, according to several different criteria at six weeks compared with the nasogastric group. In the gastrostomy group the mean albumin concentration increased from 27.1 g/l (24.5 g/l to 29.7 g/l) to 30.1 g/l (28.3 g/l to 31.9 g/l). In contrast, among the nasogastric group there was a reduction from 31.4 g/l (28.6 g/l to 34.2 g/l) to 22.3 g/l (20.7 g/l to 23.9 g/l) (P < 0.003). In addition, there were fewer treatment failures in the gastrostomy group (0/16 versus 3/14). Six patients from the gastrostomy group were discharged from hospital within six weeks of the procedure compared with none from the nasogastric group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION--This study indicates that early gastrostomy tube feeding is greatly superior to nasogastric tube feeding and should be the nutritional treatment of choice for patients with acute dysphagic stroke.
机译:目的-比较急性吞咽困难性中风后经皮内镜下胃造口术和鼻胃管喂养术。设计-对需要肠内营养的急性中风患者进行的随机前瞻性研究。地点-一所大学医院(诺丁汉)和一所地区综合医院(德比)。受试者--30急性中风后14天仍存在吞咽困难的患者:16例患者被随机分配到胃造口管喂养,14例被鼻胃管喂养。主要观察指标-六周死亡率;饲喂的饲料量;营养状况改变;治疗失败;和住院时间。结果-胃造口术组在6周时的死亡率显着降低,有2例死亡(12%),而鼻胃组8例死亡(57%)(P <0.05)。所有接受胃造口术的患者(16)均接受了规定的总饲料,而有10/14(71%)的鼻胃患者失去了至少一天的饲料。与胃造口术组(100%)相比,鼻胃病患者的处方饲料比例(78%; 95%置信区间63%至94%)显着较小(P <0.001)。根据几种不同的标准,经胃造口管喂食的患者在六周时显示出比鼻胃组更大的营养状况。在胃造口术组中,平均白蛋白浓度从27.1 g / l(24.5 g / l增加到29.7 g / l)增加到30.1 g / l(28.3 g / l增加到31.9 g / l)。相反,在鼻胃组中,从31.4 g / l(28.6 g / l降低到34.2 g / l)降低到22.3 g / l(20.7 g / l降低到23.9 g / l)(P <0.003)。此外,胃造口术组的治疗失败更少(0/16比3/14)。胃造口术组的六名患者在手术后六周内出院,而鼻胃癌组则没有出院(P <0.05)。结论-这项研究表明,早期胃造口管喂养比鼻胃管喂养要优越得多,应该成为急性吞咽困难中风患者的首选营养治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号