首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open Access >Original article: How does venture capital operate in medical innovation?
【2h】

Original article: How does venture capital operate in medical innovation?

机译:原始文章:风险资本如何在医疗创新中运作?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While health policy scholars wish to encourage the creation of technologies that bring more value to healthcare, they may not fully understand the mandate of venture capitalists and how they operate. This paper aims to clarify how venture capital operates and to illustrate its influence over the kinds of technologies that make their way into healthcare systems. The paper draws on the international innovation policy scholarship and the lessons our research team learned throughout a 5-year fieldwork conducted in Quebec (Canada). Current policies support the development of technologies that capital investors identify as valuable, and which may not align with important health needs. The level of congruence between a given health technology-based venture and the mandate of venture capital is highly variable, explaining why some types of innovation may never come into existence. While venture capitalists’ mandate and worldview are extraneous to healthcare, they shape health technologies in several, tangible ways. Clinical leaders and health policy scholars could play a more active role in innovation policy. Because certain types of technology are more likely than others to help tackle the intractable problems of healthcare systems, public policies should be equipped to promote those that address the needs of a growing elderly population, support patients who are afflicted by chronic diseases and reduce health disparities.
机译:尽管卫生政策学者希望鼓励创造能够为医疗保健带来更多价值的技术,但他们可能还没有完全了解风险资本家的职责及其运作方式。本文旨在阐明风险投资的运作方式,并说明其对进入医疗保健系统的各种技术的影响。本文借鉴了国际创新政策奖学金以及我们的研究团队在加拿大魁北克进行的为期5年的实地考察中吸取的教训。当前的政策支持资本投资者认为有价值的技术的发展,这些技术可能不符合重要的健康需求。给定的基于健康技术的风险企业与风险投资机构之间的一致性水平差异很大,这说明了为什么某些类型的创新可能永远不会出现。尽管风险资本家的职责和世界观与医疗保健无关,但它们以几种切实的方式塑造了医疗技术。临床领导者和卫生政策学者可以在创新政策中发挥更积极的作用。由于某些类型的技术比其他类型的技术更有可能帮助解决医疗保健系统的棘手问题,因此应该制定公共政策,以促进那些能够满足日益增长的老年人口需求,支持患有慢性疾病并减少健康差距的患者的需求。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号