首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open Access >Review: Non-invasive neuromodulation for migraine and cluster headache: a systematic review of clinical trials
【2h】

Review: Non-invasive neuromodulation for migraine and cluster headache: a systematic review of clinical trials

机译:评论:偏头痛和丛集性头痛的非侵入性神经调节:临床试验的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Non-invasive neuromodulation therapies for migraine and cluster headache are a practical and safe alternative to pharmacologics. Comparisons of these therapies are difficult because of the heterogeneity in study designs. In this systematic review of clinical trials, the scientific rigour and clinical relevance of the available data were assessed to inform clinical decisions about non-invasive neuromodulation. PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases and the WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched for relevant clinical studies of non-invasive neuromodulation devices for migraine and cluster headache (1 January 1990 to 31 January 2018), and 71 were identified. This analysis compared study designs using recommendations of the International Headache Society for pharmacological clinical trials, the only available guidelines for migraine and cluster headache. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), single-transcranial magnetic stimulation and external trigeminal nerve stimulation (all with regulatory clearance) were well studied compared with the other devices, for which studies frequently lacked proper blinding, sham controls and sufficient population sizes. nVNS studies demonstrated the most consistent adherence to available guidelines. Studies of all neuromodulation devices should strive to achieve the same high level of scientific rigour to allow for proper comparison across devices. Device-specific guidelines for migraine and cluster headache will be soon available, but adherence to current guidelines for pharmacological trials will remain a key consideration for investigators and clinicians.
机译:偏头痛和丛集性头痛的非侵入性神经调节疗法是药理学的一种实用且安全的替代方法。由于研究设计的异质性,很难比较这些疗法。在对临床试验的系统评价中,评估了可用数据的科学严谨性和临床相关性,以为有关非侵入性神经调节的临床决策提供依据。搜索PubMed,Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库以及WHO的国际临床试验注册平台,以寻找有关非侵入性神经调节装置治疗偏头痛和丛集性头痛的相关临床研究(1990年1月1日至2018年1月31日),共确定71例。该分析使用国际头痛学会药理临床试验的建议(偏头痛和丛集性头痛的唯一可用指南)对研究设计进行了比较。与其他设备相比,对无创迷走神经刺激(nVNS),单经颅磁刺激和三叉神经外部刺激(均具有调节清除)进行了深入研究,这些研究通常缺乏适当的盲法,假手术控制和足够的人口规模。 nVNS研究表明最一致地遵守了可用指南。所有神经调节装置的研究都应努力达到同样高的科学严谨性,以便在各个装置之间进行适当的比较。偏头痛和丛集性头痛的特定于设备的指南将很快面世,但是遵守当前药理试验指南仍将是研究者和临床医生的主要考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号