首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment: a simulation exercise on metastatic colorectal cancer with multiple stakeholders in the English setting
【2h】

Multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment: a simulation exercise on metastatic colorectal cancer with multiple stakeholders in the English setting

机译:卫生技术评估中的多标准决策分析:在英语环境中由多个利益相关者进行的转移性结直肠癌模拟练习

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundMultiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has appeared as a methodology to address limitations of economic evaluation in health technology assessment (HTA), however there are limited empirical evidence from real world applications. The aim of this study is to test in practice a recently developed MCDA methodological framework known as Advance Value Framework (AVF) through a proof-of-concept case study engaging multiple stakeholders.
机译:背景技术多标准决策分析(MCDA)已作为一种解决卫生技术评估(HTA)中经济评估局限性的方法而出现,但是来自实际应用的经验证据有限。这项研究的目的是通过涉及多个利益相关者的概念验证案例研究,在实践中测试一种最新开发的MCDA方法论框架,称为先进价值框架(AVF)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号