首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BioMed Research International >Baseline Obesity Status Modifies Effectiveness of Adapted Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in Primary Care
【2h】

Baseline Obesity Status Modifies Effectiveness of Adapted Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in Primary Care

机译:基线肥胖状况可改善适应性糖尿病预防计划生活方式干预在初级保健中体重管理中的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To examine whether baseline obesity severity modifies the effects of two different, primary care-based, technology-enhanced lifestyle interventions among overweight or obese adults with prediabetes and/or metabolic syndrome. Patients and Methods. We compared mean differences in changes from baseline to 15 months in clinical measures of general and central obesity among participants randomized to usual care alone (n = 81) or usual care plus a coach-led group (n = 79) or self-directed individual (n = 81) intervention, stratified by baseline body mass index (BMI) category. Results. Participants with baseline BMI 35+ had greater reductions in mean BMI, body weight (as percentage change), and waist circumference in the coach-led group intervention, compared to usual care and the self-directed individual intervention (P < 0.05 for all). In contrast, the self-directed intervention was more effective than usual care only among participants with baseline BMIs between 25 ≤ 35. Mean weight loss exceeded 5% in the coach-led intervention regardless of baseline BMI category, but this was achieved only among self-directed intervention participants with baseline BMIs <35. Conclusions. Baseline BMI may influence behavioral weight-loss treatment effectiveness. Researchers and clinicians should take an individual's baseline BMI into account when developing or recommending lifestyle focused treatment strategy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov .
机译:目的。为了研究基线肥胖严重程度是否改变了患有糖尿病和/或代谢综合症的超重或肥胖成年人中两种不同的,基于初级保健的,以技术为基础的生活方式干预的效果。患者和方法。我们比较了随机和常规护理(n = 81)或常规护理加教练指导组(n = 79)或自我指导的个体从总体到中心性肥胖的临床测量值从基线到15个月变化的平均差异(n = 81)干预,按基线体重指数(BMI)类别进行分层。结果。与常规护理和自我指导的个体干预相比,基线为BMI 35+的参与者在教练指导的小组干预中的平均BMI,体重(百分比变化)和腰围的降低更大(所有P均<0.05) 。相反,仅在基线BMI在25≤35之间的参与者中,自我指导干预比常规护理更有效。无论基线BMI类别如何,在教练指导的干预中平均体重减轻超过5%,但这仅在自我干预中实现基线BMI <35的定向干预参与者。结论。基线BMI可能会影响行为减肥治疗的效果。在制定或推荐以生活方式为中心的治疗策略时,研究人员和临床医生应考虑个人的基线BMI。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号