首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BioMed Research International >Accuracy Assessment of Using Rapid Prototyping Drill Templates for Atlantoaxial Screw Placement: A Cadaver Study
【2h】

Accuracy Assessment of Using Rapid Prototyping Drill Templates for Atlantoaxial Screw Placement: A Cadaver Study

机译:使用快速原型钻模板进行寰枢椎螺钉置入的准确性评估:Cadaver研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To preliminarily evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using rapid prototyping drill templates (RPDTs) for C1 lateral mass screw (C1-LMS) and C2 pedicle screw (C2-PS) placement. Methods. 23 formalin-fixed craniocervical cadaver specimens were randomly divided into two groups. In the conventional method group, intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to assist the screw placement. In the RPDT navigation group, specific RPDTs were constructed for each specimen and were used intraoperatively for screw placement navigation. The screw position, the operating time, and the fluoroscopy time for each screw placement were compared between the 2 groups. Results. Compared with the conventional method, the RPDT technique significantly increased the placement accuracy of the C2-PS (p < 0.05). In the axial plane, using RPDTs also significantly increased C1-LMS placement accuracy (p < 0.05). In the sagittal plane, although using RPDTs had a very high accuracy rate (100%) in C1-LMS placement, it was not statistically significant compared with the conventional method (p > 0.05). Moreover, the RPDT technique significantly decreased the operating and fluoroscopy times. Conclusion. Using RPDTs significantly increases the accuracy of C1-LMS and C2-PS placement while decreasing the screw placement time and the radiation exposure. Due to these advantages, this approach is worth promoting for use in the Harms technique.
机译:目的。为了初步评估使用快速原型钻模板(RPDT)进行C1侧向质量螺钉(C1-LMS)和C2椎弓根螺钉(C2-PS)的可行性和准确性。方法。将23份福尔马林固定的颅颈尸体标本随机分为两组。在常规方法组中,术中荧光检查被用于辅助螺钉放置。在RPDT导航组中,为每个标本构建特定的RPDT,并在术中用于螺钉放置导航。比较两组之间每个螺钉放置的螺钉位置,操作时间和荧光检查时间。结果。与传统方法相比,RPDT技术显着提高了C2-PS的放置精度(p <0.05)。在轴向平面上,使用RPDT还可显着提高C1-LMS的放置精度(p <0.05)。在矢状面中,尽管使用RPDT在C1-LMS放置中具有很高的准确率(100%),但与传统方法相比,在统计学上没有统计学意义(p> 0.05)。此外,RPDT技术显着减少了操作和荧光检查的时间。结论。使用RPDT可以显着提高C1-LMS和C2-PS的放置精度,同时减少螺钉放置时间和辐射暴露。由于这些优点,这种方法值得推广用于危害技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号