首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biochemia Medica >Expected long-term defect rate of analytical performance in the medical laboratory: Assured Sigma versus observed Sigma
【2h】

Expected long-term defect rate of analytical performance in the medical laboratory: Assured Sigma versus observed Sigma

机译:预期的医学实验室分析性能的长期缺陷率:保证的Sigma与观察到的Sigma

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reliability of laboratory results is determined by the ratio of incorrect results expected in long-term. Sigma is a measure of defect ratio, therefore long-term Sigma is a measure of the reliability of laboratory results. Commonly, long-term Sigma is estimated based on the short-term Sigma. The Six Sigma methodology assumes that in long-term performances will shift up to 1.5 Sigma, and therefore the long-term Sigma is considered 1.5 Sigma less than short-term Sigma. Analytical performance in the medical laboratory is prone to shifts larger than 1.5 Sigma. Thus, the 1.5 Sigma shift assumed in the Six Sigma is not a correct estimate in the medical laboratory. On the other hand, in the medical laboratory statistical quality control procedure (SQC) is applied to detect and correct shifts. Since SQC can be planned to trap shifts of different sizes, the threshold set for SQC determines the defect rate expected for long-term.
机译:实验室结果的可靠性取决于长期预期的不正确结果的比率。 Sigma是缺陷率的度量,因此长期Sigma是实验室结果可靠性的度量。通常,基于短期Sigma估算长期Sigma。六西格码方法假设长期性能会上升到1.5西格玛,因此长期西格玛被认为比短期西格玛低1.5西格玛。医学实验室的分析性能变化可能大于1.5 Sigma。因此,在六西格玛中假设的1.5西格玛位移不是医学实验室的正确估计。另一方面,在医学实验室中,统计质量控制程序(SQC)用于检测和纠正班次。由于可以计划SQC以捕获不同大小的偏移,因此为SQC设置的阈值确定了长期预期的缺陷率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号