首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biochemia Medica >False positive immunoassay for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the presence of monoclonal gammopathy: a case report
【2h】

False positive immunoassay for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the presence of monoclonal gammopathy: a case report

机译:单克隆丙种球蛋白病存在下肝素诱导的血小板减少症的假阳性免疫分析:一例报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening disorder which diagnosis depends on laboratory evaluation. The objective of this report is to present the impact of different laboratory methods for HIT detection on the diagnostic evaluation process. In this case, a 78-year old female patient previously diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) was administered with heparin for pulmonary embolism treatment. Patient’s initial diagnostic work-up (determination of platelet count and prothrombin time measurement for monitoring of pharmacotherapy) was followed by the clinical estimation of HIT likelihood by “4Ts” score, two immunoassays (ID-PaGIA Heparin/PF4 Antibody Test and ELISA PF4 IgG assay) and one functional test called high-performance liquid chromatography serotonin release assay (HPLC-SRA). The result of “4Ts” score indicated a low likelihood of HIT but persistent thrombocytopenia that appeared days after discontinuation of heparin therapy suggested delayed-onset HIT. Both immunoassays were positive for presence of HIT-autoantibodies, while the functional HPLC-SRA was negative. Since different methods gave opposing results, their interpretation required great attention. In comparison to the HPLC-SRA, immunoassays are prone to the analytical interferences associated with the presence of non-specific antibodies, which may lead to false positive results. In this case, where the patient is known to produce antibodies of undetermined significance, HIT was ruled out as the possible cause of persistent thrombocytopenia primarily due to the negative result of HPLC-SRA, which is not prone to this type of interferences, but also due to the low “4Ts” clinical score.
机译:肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)是威胁生命的疾病,其诊断取决于实验室评估。本报告的目的是介绍用于HIT检测的不同实验室方法对诊断评估过程的影响。在这种情况下,先前诊断为意义不明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病(MGUS)的78岁女性患者接受肝素治疗,用于肺栓塞治疗。患者的初步诊断检查(确定血小板计数和凝血酶原时间测量,以监测药物治疗),然后通过“ 4Ts”评分,两种免疫测定(ID-PaGIA肝素/ PF4抗体检测和ELISA PF4 IgG)对HIT可能性进行临床评估分析)和一项功能测试,称为高效液相色谱血清素释放分析(HPLC-SRA)。 “ 4Ts”评分的结果表明,HIT的可能性较低,但是在中止肝素治疗后数天出现的持续性血小板减少症提示HIT起病延迟。两种免疫测定均显示HIT自身抗体呈阳性,而功能性HPLC-SRA呈阴性。由于不同的方法给出相反的结果,因此它们的解释需要引起高度重视。与HPLC-SRA相比,免疫测定容易受到与非特异性抗体的存在相关的分析干扰,这可能会导致假阳性结果。在这种情况下,已知患者产生的抗体的重要性未定,主要是由于HPLC-SRA的阴性结果,HIT被排除为持续性血小板减少的可能原因,这种情况不易发生此类干扰,而且由于较低的“ 4Ts”临床评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号