首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Arthritis Research >Patient global assessment in measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the literature
【2h】

Patient global assessment in measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the literature

机译:对类风湿关节炎疾病活动度的患者总体评估:文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect the patient’s perspective and are used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) routine clinical practice. Patient global assessment (PGA) is one of the most widely used PROs in RA practice and research and is included in several composite scores such as the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28). PGA is often assessed by a single question with a 0–10 or 0–100 response. The content can vary and relates either to global health (e.g., how is your health overall) or to disease activity (e.g., how active is your arthritis). The wordings used as anchors, i.e., for the score of 0, 10, or 100 according to the scale used, and the timing (i.e., this day or this week) also vary. The different possible ways of measuring PGA translate into variations in its interpretation and reporting and may impact on measures of disease activity and consequently achievement of treat-to-target goals. Furthermore, although PGA is associated with objective measures of disease activity, it is also associated with other aspects of health, such as psychological distress or comorbidities, which leads to situations of discordance between objective RA assessments and PGA. Focusing on the role of PGA, its use and interpretation in RA, this review explores its validity and correlations with other disease measures and its overall value for research and routine clinical practice.
机译:患者报告的结局(PRO)反映了患者的观点,并用于类风湿关节炎(RA)的常规临床实践中。患者总体评估(PGA)是RA实践和研究中使用最广泛的PRO之一,并且包括在多个综合评分中,例如28关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)。 PGA通常是通过回答0-10或0-100的单个问题进行评估的。内容可能会有所不同,并且与整体健康(例如,您的整体健康状况)或疾病活动(例如,您的关节炎有多活跃)相关。用作锚的用语,即根据所使用的量表,得分为0、10或100,并且时间(即今天或本周)也有所不同。测量PGA的不同可能方法会转化为不同的解释和报告,并可能影响疾病活动性的衡量标准,从而影响治疗目标的实现。此外,尽管PGA与疾病活动的客观测量相关,但它也与健康的其他方面(例如心理困扰或合并症)相关,这导致客观RA评估与PGA之间出现不一致的情况。围绕PGA的作用,其在RA中的使用和解释,本综述探讨了其与其他疾病措施的有效性和相关性,以及其在研究和常规临床实践中的总体价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号