首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Occupational Hygiene >A Comparison of Two Laboratories for the Measurement of Wood Dust Using Button Sampler and Diffuse Reflection Infrared Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS)
【2h】

A Comparison of Two Laboratories for the Measurement of Wood Dust Using Button Sampler and Diffuse Reflection Infrared Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS)

机译:使用按钮采样器和漫反射红外傅里叶变换光谱仪(DRIFTS)测量木屑的两个实验室的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The current measurement method for occupational exposure to wood dust is by gravimetric analysis and is thus non-specific. In this work, diffuse reflection infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) for the analysis of only the wood component of dust was further evaluated by analysis of the same samples between two laboratories. Field samples were collected from six wood product factories using 25-mm glass fiber filters with the Button aerosol sampler. Gravimetric mass was determined in one laboratory by weighing the filters before and after aerosol collection. Diffuse reflection mid-infrared spectra were obtained from the wood dust on the filter which is placed on a motorized stage inside the spectrometer. The metric used for the DRIFTS analysis was the intensity of the carbonyl band in cellulose and hemicellulose at ~1735 cm−1. Calibration curves were constructed separately in both laboratories using the same sets of prepared filters from the inhalable sampling fraction of red oak, southern yellow pine, and western red cedar in the range of 0.125–4 mg of wood dust. Using the same procedure in both laboratories to build the calibration curve and analyze the field samples, 62.3% of the samples measured within 25% of the average result with a mean difference between the laboratories of 18.5%. Some observations are included as to how the calibration and analysis can be improved. In particular, determining the wood type on each sample to allow matching to the most appropriate calibration increases the apparent proportion of wood dust in the sample and this likely provides more realistic DRIFTS results.
机译:当前用于职业暴露于木屑的测量方法是通过重量分析,因此是非特异性的。在这项工作中,通过分析两个实验室之间的相同样品,进一步评估了仅用于分析粉尘木质成分的漫反射红外傅里叶变换光谱(DRIFTS)。使用25毫米玻璃纤维过滤器和Button气溶胶采样器,从六个木制品工厂收集了现场样品。在一个实验室中,通过在气溶胶收集之前和之后称量过滤器的重量来确定重量质量。从滤光片上的木屑获得了漫反射中红外光谱,滤光片位于光谱仪内部的电动平台上。 DRIFTS分析所用的度量标准是纤维素和半纤维素中羰基带的强度,约为〜1735 cm -1 。在两个实验室中,分别使用从红橡树,南部黄松和西部红柏的可吸入采样份额中的0.125–4 mg木材粉尘的可吸入采样部分准备的相同过滤器,分别构建了校准曲线。在两个实验室中使用相同的程序绘制校准曲线并分析现场样品,所测样品中的62.3%在平均结果的25%范围内,而两个实验室之间的平均差异为18.5%。包括一些有关如何改进校准和分析的观察结果。特别是,确定每个样品的木材类型以使其与最合适的校准相匹配,会增加样品中木材粉尘的表观比例,这可能会提供更真实的DRIFTS结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号