首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Analysis of Verbal Behavior >An Assessment of Three Procedures to Teach Echoic Responding
【2h】

An Assessment of Three Procedures to Teach Echoic Responding

机译:评估回声响应的三种程序的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The research literature has revealed mixed outcomes on various procedures for increasing vocalizations and echoic responding in persons with disabilities (Miguel, Carr, & Michael The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 3–13, ; Stock, Schulze, & Mirenda The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 123–133, ). We examined the efficacy of an assessment procedure for identifying the most effective echoic teaching procedure to six students diagnosed autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental delays. The assessment procedure included a within-participant comparison of vocal imitation training (VIT), stimulus–stimulus pairing (SSP), and a mand-model procedure (MM). A functional analysis of the responses was conducted to determine whether responding was functionally an echoic or a mand. The results indicated that the assessment was effective in identifying a teaching procedure for five out of the six participants and that responding was established under echoic control. These outcomes support the efficacy of this assessment procedure for identifying effective echoic teaching procedures.
机译:研究文献揭示了在提高残疾人的发声和回声反应的各种程序上的不同结果(Miguel,Carr和Michael,《言语行为分析》,第18、3-13页; Stock,Schulze和Mirenda,《言语分析》,行为,24,123–133,)。我们检查了评估程序的有效性,该程序可为6名被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和其他发育迟缓的学生确定最有效的回声教学程序。评估程序包括对参与者的声音模仿训练(VIT),刺激-刺激配对(SSP)和Mand-model程序(MM)的内部比较。对响应进行功能分析,以确定响应在功能上是回声还是要求。结果表明,该评估有效地确定了六名参与者中五名参与者的教学程序,并且在回声控制下建立了响应。这些结果支持了此评估程序对识别有效回声教学程序的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号