首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Primary Care Emergency Preparedness Network New York City 2015: Comparison of Member and Nonmember Sites
【2h】

Primary Care Emergency Preparedness Network New York City 2015: Comparison of Member and Nonmember Sites

机译:2015年纽约市初级卫生保健应急准备网络:会员和非会员站点的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. To assess whether Primary Care Emergency Preparedness Network member sites reported indicators of preparedness for public health emergencies compared with nonmember sites. The network—a collaboration between government and New York City primary care associations—offers technical assistance to primary care sites to improve disaster preparedness and response.Methods. In 2015, we administered an online questionnaire to sites regarding facility characteristics and preparedness indicators. We estimated differences between members and nonmembers with natural logarithm–linked binomial models. Open-ended assessments identified preparedness gaps.Results. One hundred seven sites completed the survey (23.3% response rate); 47 (43.9%) were nonmembers and 60 (56.1%) were members. Members were more likely to have completed hazard vulnerability analysis (risk ratio [RR] = 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28, 2.93), to have identified essential services for continuity of operations (RR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.86), to have memoranda of understanding with external partners (RR = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.42, 4.36), and to have completed point-of-dispensing training (RR = 4.23; 95% CI = 1.76, 10.14). Identified preparedness gaps were improved communication, resource availability, and train-the-trainer programs.Public Health Implications. Primary Care Emergency Preparedness Network membership is associated with improved public health emergency preparedness among primary care sites.
机译:目标。为了评估基层医疗应急准备网络的成员站点是否报告了与非成员站点相比的公共卫生紧急情况的准备指标。该网络是政府与纽约市初级卫生保健协会之间的合作,为初级卫生保健站点提供技术援助,以提高灾难防范和响应能力。 2015年,我们对工厂的设施特点和备灾指标进行了在线问卷调查。我们使用自然对数关联的二项式模型估计成员与非成员之间的差异。不限成员名额的评估确定了准备方面的差距。一百七个站点完成了调查(答复率为23.3%); 47个(43.9%)是非成员,而60(56.1%)是成员。成员更有可能完成危害脆弱性分析(风险比[RR] = 1.94; 95%置信区间[CI] = 1.28、2.93),从而确定了运营连续性的基本服务(RR = 1.39; 95%CI == 1.03,1.86),与外部合作伙伴达成谅解备忘录(RR = 2.49; 95%CI = 1.42,4.36),并完成了配药点培训(RR = 4.23; 95%CI = 1.76,10.14) 。识别出的准备差距是改善的沟通,资源可用性和培训讲师计划。对公共健康的影响。基层医疗应急准备网络的成员资格与基层医疗场所之间公共卫生应急准备的改善有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号