首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Reassuring or Risky: The Presentation of Seafood Safety in the Aftermath of the British Petroleum Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
【2h】

Reassuring or Risky: The Presentation of Seafood Safety in the Aftermath of the British Petroleum Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

机译:放心还是冒险:英国石油深水地平线漏油事件发生后的海鲜安全演示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill was enormously newsworthy; coverage interlaced discussions of health, economic, and environmental impacts and risks. We analyzed 315 news articles that considered Gulf seafood safety from the year following the spill. We explored reporting trends, risk presentation, message source, stakeholder perspectives on safety, and framing of safety messages. Approximately one third of articles presented risk associated with seafood consumption as a standalone issue, rather than in conjunction with environmental or economic risks. Government sources were most frequent and their messages were largely framed as reassuring as to seafood safety. Discussions of prevention were limited to short-term, secondary prevention approaches. These data demonstrate a need for risk communication in news coverage of food safety that addresses the larger risk context, primary prevention, and structural causes of risk.
机译:BP深水地平线漏油事件极具新闻价值。覆盖范围涉及健康,经济和环境影响与风险的讨论。我们分析了漏油事件发生后第二年有315篇考虑海湾海鲜安全性的新闻。我们探索了报告趋势,风险表示,消息来源,利益相关者对安全的观点以及安全消息的框架。约有三分之一的文章将与海产品消费有关的风险作为一个独立问题,而不是与环境或经济风险相联系。政府消息来源最为频繁,他们的信息基本上都使人放心海鲜安全。关于预防的讨论仅限于短期的二级预防方法。这些数据表明,在食品安全新闻报道中需要进行风险交流,以解决更大的风险背景,一级预防和风险的结构性原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号