首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Under the Radar: How Unexamined Biases in Decision-Making Processes in Clinical Interactions Can Contribute to Health Care Disparities
【2h】

Under the Radar: How Unexamined Biases in Decision-Making Processes in Clinical Interactions Can Contribute to Health Care Disparities

机译:雷达之下:临床互动决策过程中未经审查的偏见如何导致医疗保健差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Several aspects of social psychological science shed light on how unexamined racial/ethnic biases contribute to health care disparities.Biases are complex but systematic, differing by racial/ethnic group and not limited to love–hate polarities. Group images on the universal social cognitive dimensions of competence and warmth determine the content of each group's overall stereotype, distinct emotional prejudices (pity, envy, disgust, pride), and discriminatory tendencies. These biases are often unconscious and occur despite the best intentions.Such ambivalent and automatic biases can influence medical decisions and interactions, systematically producing discrimination in health care and ultimately disparities in health. Understanding how these processes may contribute to bias in health care can help guide interventions to address racial and ethnic disparities in health.
机译:社会心理学的几个方面揭示了未经检查的种族/族裔偏见如何导致医疗保健差异。偏见是复杂的,但是系统的,因种族/族裔群体而异,并不局限于爱恨交织的极性。能力和温暖在普遍的社会认知维度上的小组图像确定了每个小组的总体刻板印象,不同的情感偏见(可怜,嫉妒,厌恶,自尊)和歧视性倾向的内容。这些偏见通常是无意识的,尽管有最好的意图,但仍会发生。这种矛盾和自动的偏见会影响医疗决策和互动,有系统地在医疗保健中产生歧视,最终导致健康差异。了解这些过程如何导致医疗保健偏见可以帮助指导干预措施,以解决健康方面的种族和种族差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号