首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Our Reach Is Wide by Any Corporate Standard: How the Tobacco Industry Helped Defeat the Clinton Health Plan and Why It Matters Now
【2h】

Our Reach Is Wide by Any Corporate Standard: How the Tobacco Industry Helped Defeat the Clinton Health Plan and Why It Matters Now

机译:通过任何公司标准我们的影响力都是广泛的:烟草业如何帮助击败克林顿卫生计划以及为什么现在如此

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Contemporary health care reformers, like those who promoted the failed Clinton era plan, face opposition from multiple corporate interests. However, scant literature has examined how relationships between corporations and other stakeholders, such as think tanks and advocacy groups, shape health care reform debate.We show how the 2 biggest US tobacco companies, Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds, and their trade association coordinated in mobilizing ideologically diverse constituencies to help defeat the Clinton plan. Unwittingly perhaps, some reform supporters advanced the tobacco industry's public relations blitz, contributing to perceptions of public opposition to the plan.As the current reform debate unfolds, this case highlights the importance of funding transparency for interpreting the activities of think tanks, advocacy groups, and “grassroots” movements.
机译:像那些推动克林顿时代计划失败的人一样,当代医疗改革者也面临着来自多个公司利益的反对。然而,鲜有文献研究了公司与其他利益相关者(例如智囊团和倡导团体)之间的关系如何影响医疗改革的辩论。我们展示了美国最大的两家烟草公司Philip Morris和RJ Reynolds及其贸易协会如何协调动员意识形态上不同的选区以帮助克林顿计划失败。也许不经意间,一些改革的支持者推动了烟草业的公共关系突击,使公众对该计划产生了反对感。随着当前改革辩论的进行,该案凸显了为解释智囊团,倡导团体,和“草根”运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号