首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Aesculapian >Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996–2000
【2h】

Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996–2000

机译:映射护理文献:1996–2000

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: This project is a collaborative effort of the Task Force on Mapping the Nursing Literature of the Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section of the Medical Library Association. This overview summarizes eighteen studies covering general nursing and sixteen specialties.>Method: Following a common protocol, citations from source journals were analyzed for a three-year period within the years 1996 to 2000. Analysis included cited formats, age, and ranking of the frequency of cited journal titles. Highly cited journals were analyzed for coverage in twelve health sciences and academic databases.>Results: Journals were the most frequently cited format, followed by books. More than 60% of the cited resources were published in the previous seven years. Bradford's law was validated, with a small core of cited journals accounting for a third of the citations. Medical and science databases provided the most comprehensive access for biomedical titles, while CINAHL and PubMed provided the best access for nursing journals.>Discussion: Beyond a heavily cited core, nursing journal citations are widely dispersed among a variety of sources and disciplines, with corresponding access via a variety of bibliographic tools. Results underscore the interdisciplinary nature of the nursing profession.>Conclusion: For comprehensive searches, nurses need to search multiple databases. Libraries need to provide access to databases beyond PubMed, including CINAHL and academic databases. Database vendors should improve their coverage of nursing, biomedical, and psychosocial titles identified in these studies. Additional research is needed to update these studies and analyze nursing specialties not covered.
机译:>简介:该项目是医学图书馆协会护理与专职健康资源科的护理文献制图工作组的共同努力。该概述总结了涵盖普通护理和16个专业的18项研究。>方法:按照通用协议,对源期刊的引文进行了1996年至2000年的三年分析。分析包括引用的格式,年龄,以及引用的期刊标题的频率排名。分析了被高引用的期刊在十二种健康科学和学术数据库中的覆盖率。>结果:期刊是最常被引用的格式,其次是书籍。在过去的七年中,超过60%的引用资源都已发布。布拉德福德定律得到了验证,被引用期刊的一小部分核心被引用了三分之一。医学和科学数据库为生物医学标题提供了最全面的访问途径,而CINAHL和PubMed为护理期刊提供了最佳访问途径。>讨论:除了被广泛引用的核心内容外,护理期刊引文还广泛散布在各种资源和学科,并可以通过各种书目工具进行相应访问。结果强调了护理专业的跨学科性质。>结论:要进行全面搜索,护士需要搜索多个数据库。图书馆需要提供对PubMed以外的数据库的访问,包括CINAHL和学术数据库。数据库供应商应改善对这些研究中确定的护理,生物医学和社会心理职称的覆盖范围。需要进行其他研究以更新这些研究并分析未涵盖的护理专业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号