首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AAPS PharmSci >Toward Global Standards for Comparator Pharmaceutical Products: Case Studies of Amoxicillin Metronidazole and Zidovudine in the Americas
【2h】

Toward Global Standards for Comparator Pharmaceutical Products: Case Studies of Amoxicillin Metronidazole and Zidovudine in the Americas

机译:迈向比较药物全球标准:美洲阿莫西林甲硝唑和齐多夫定的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared in vitro dissolution characteristics and other quality measures of different amoxicillin, metronidazole, and zidovudine products purchased in the Americas to a comparator pharmaceutical product (CPP). These three drugs are classified as Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class I drugs with the possibility that dissolution findings might be used to document bioequivalence. All investigated zidovudine products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. Only 3 of 12 tested amoxicillin products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. None of the tested metronidazole products were in vitro equivalent to the CPP. These findings suggest but do not confirm bioinequivalence where in vitro comparisons failed, given that an in vivo blood level study might have confirmed bioequivalence. At times, identifying a CPP in one of the selected markets proved difficult. The study demonstrates that products sold across national markets may not be bioequivalent. When coupled with the challenge of identifying a CPP in different countries, the results of this study suggest the value of an international CPP as well as increased use of BCS approaches as means of either documenting bioequivalence or signaling the need for further in vivo studies. Because of increased movement of medicines across national borders, practitioners and patients would benefit from these approaches.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9350-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:这项研究将在美洲购买的不同阿莫西林,甲硝唑和齐多夫定产品的体外溶出度特征和其他质量指标与比较药品(CPP)进行了比较。这三种药物被归类为生物制药分类系统I类药物,有可能使用溶出度结果来证明生物等效性。发现所有调查过的齐多夫定产品在体外都等同于CPP。在12种经测试的阿莫西林产品中,只有3种在体外等效于CPP。所测试的甲硝唑产品在体外均不等同于CPP。这些发现提示,但由于体内血液水平研究可能已经证实了生物等效性,因此在体外比较失败的情况下并不能证实其生物等效性。有时很难在选定的市场之一中确定CPP。该研究表明,在全国市场上销售的产品可能不是生物等效的。结合在不同国家/地区识别CPP的挑战,这项研究的结果表明了国际CPP的价值以及BCS方法越来越多地用作证明生物等效性或表示需要进行进一步体内研究的手段。由于药物跨界流动的增加,从业者和患者将从这些方法中受益。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1208 / s12248-012-9350-9)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号