Mineral inclusions can record geological environment and the characteristics of physical-chemical condition of different stages in the forming process. Because no material exchange in the later process with the hosting rocks, its was used as an important methods in the study of geological fluid. By using fluid inclution, this paper calculated the forming depth and denudated thickness for Zhoujiashan and Shazhou uranium deposits and found that Zhoujiashan deposit was formed in the depth of 320 "-1640m and the denudated thickness is 320~416m; while Shazhou deposit was formed at 38-1425m and the denudated thickness is 190~240m. These results is similar to the former study conclution. The study of Haas (1976) on metallogenic depth of Shazhou uranium deposit with Graphical method was relatively reasonable. The study of Shao Jielian etc. (1986) on metallogenic depth of Zhoujiashan with experience formula method got the most rational result. However, the study result by Bischoff et al. (1991) with Phase diagram method was with bigger error.%矿物包裹体在形成过程中保存了所在地质环境及不同阶段的物理化学条件信息,并且其形成后没有外来物质的加入和自身物质的带出,因此对流体包裹体进行分析是研究成矿地质环境的重要手段之一.本文以相山铀矿田邹家山、沙洲矿床为例,采用流体包裹体分析法计算矿床的成矿深度和剥蚀厚度.结果表明,邹家山矿床成矿深度320～1640m,剥蚀厚度320～416m；沙洲矿床成矿深度38～～1425m,剥蚀厚度190～240m,大体上与前人研究结论一致.Haas (1976)图解法在沙洲矿床成矿深度研究中比较接近合理,邵沽涟等(1986)的经验公式法在邹家山矿床成矿深度研究中最为合理,Bischoff et al. (1991) T-ρ相图法误差均较大.
展开▼
