《国际足联运动员身份与转会规则》(以下简称RSTP规则)第15条规定，职业球员可以通过主张体育性正当理由来单边解除与俱乐部之间的劳动合同。通过与RSTP规则第14条规定的正当理由这一概念进行比较，并从国际足联公布的实践案例进行实证考察，对体育性正当理由进行全面分析。结合我国职业足球合同纠纷的法律适用现状，提出俱乐部之间的劳动争议不能用《劳动合同法》生搬硬套，而应根据其行业规则灵活运用，并建议我国引入体育性正当理由这一规定，但应在国际足联相关规定的基础上结合我国具体情况进行修改完善。%The Article 15 in the FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) states that a professional player has the right of terminating the employment contract with his club unilaterally according to sport justification. Based on the concept of justification included in the Article 14 of RSTP and the empiri-cal observation of the cases issued by FIFA, the article makes an overall analysis of sport justification. In line with the status quo of the legal application in solving the disputes of the professional soccer contracts in Chi-na, it states that the player's labor dispute with the club cannot be solved with Labor Contract Law mechani-cally. The flexible application according to the rules of the industry is more suitable. The article suggests that sport justification should be applied in China on the premise of modification and perfection on the basis of FIFA regulations and the actual situation in China.
展开▼
