目的 观察两种止血方法的优劣及相关不良反应情况.方法 60例患者随机分为观察组、对照组,各30例,观察组采用NZ-1型动脉压迫止血器,对照组采用传统压迫止血法.结果 观察组止血操作的时间及穿刺肢体制动时间明显少于对照组(P＜0.01),不良反应发生率低于对照组(P＜0.05).结论 脑血管病造影术后应用NZ-1型动脉压迫止血器可以明显缩短止血操作时间、肢体制动时间,同时减轻操作者及患者不适感.%Objective To investigate the differences between the NZ-1 artery compression hemostat versus conventional manual compression following opacification of cerebrovascular disease. Methods 60 patients were random divided into two groups. In the observation group, the NZ-1 artery compression hemostat was adopted; while in the control group the conventional manual compression and sand bag compression was adopted. Results The operation of stopping bleeding and the time of restrain in the observation group was obviously less lhan the control group(P ＜0.01) ; the incidence rates of comfort degree and the relevant adverse effects were obviously lower than the control group( P ＜0.05). Conclusion NZ-1 artery compression hemostat after opacification of cerebrovascular disease significantly shortens time of stopping bleeding and restrain, thereby lightens the workload of operators and mitigate the body and mental discomfort of patients.
展开▼
