不同方向合谷刺治疗疼痛期肩关节周围炎疗效观察

摘要

目的：采用不同方向合谷刺法治疗疼痛期肩关节周围炎(简称肩周炎),通过观察其临床疗效,探讨不同方向合谷刺法各自的优势。方法采用随机对照的研究方法,将60例疼痛期肩周炎患者分为治疗Ⅰ组(30例)和治疗Ⅱ组(30例)。治疗Ⅰ组对肩髃、肩髎、肩贞穴位采用沿经脉循行方向针刺治疗,治疗Ⅱ组对肩髃、肩髎、肩贞穴位采用垂直经脉循行方向针刺治疗。每次治疗30 min,共治疗12次。治疗前后观察简化的McGill疼痛问卷、肩关节疾患治疗成绩判定标准(JOA)的评分变化。结果两组治疗前后及治疗过程中,对疼痛、关节活动度、关节功能的评价上无明显的统计学差异。结论两种不同操作方法的合谷刺治疗疼痛期肩周炎疗效均显著,两者无明显差异。%Objective To explore the respective advantages of different direction Hegu needlings by using them to treat the pain stage of scapulohumeral periarthritis (periarthritis of shoulder) and investigating their clinical therapeutic effects. Method A randomized controlled trial was carried out. Sixty patients with scapulohumeral periarthritis in the pain stage were allocated into group Ⅰ (30 cases) and group Ⅱ (30 cases). Group Ⅰ received acupuncture at points Jianyu(LI15), Jianliao(TE14) and Jianzhen(SI9) in the direction parallel to the meridian course and group Ⅱ , in the direction perpendicular to the meridian course. Treatment was given 30 min once for a total of 12 times. The simplified Mcgill Pain Questionnaire score and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were recorded before and after treatment. Result There were no statistically significant differences in the pain, joint activity and joint function between the two groups before, during and after treatment. Conclusion Two different direction Hegu needlings both have a marked therapeutic effect on the pain stage of scapulohumeral periarthritis. The two have no significant difference.