In theory, social compensation is an "administrative morality" approach of "non-equality" and "top-down" to in the social security system, while social indemnify is a kind of Law Society for "equality", "fairness" and "deliberative" democracy approach, it's more conducive to urban land expropriation caused by social conflict governance.From the useful experience of Suzhou, Wuhan, Chongqing on the "protection" of farmers' land rights, the higher the level of productivity of the city is, the higher quality is on the corresponding benefit distribution in the land expropriation policy of urbanization.Therefore, China's urbanization increases with the continuous improvement of the level of productivity, the corresponding decision of the government to provide "land expropriation policy in urbanization" service level should also be improved, that is, to achieve a policy system transformation "land expropriation policy in urbanization" by a relatively low standard "guarantee type" to a relatively high standard "protection".%从理论上讲,社会补偿是一种社会保障体制内"非平等性""自上而下"的"行政道德"性做法,而社会赔偿是一种法治社会追寻的"平等性""公正性""协商性"的民主做法,更有利于城镇化土地征收引发的社会冲突治理.从苏州、武汉、重庆关于"保护"农民土地权益的有益经验看,生产力水平越高的城市,相应的在城镇化土地征收政策的利益分配方面质量就越高.因此,中国城镇化建设随着生产力水平的不断提升,相应地决定了政府提供"城镇化土地征收政策"的服务水平也应提高,即实现"城镇化土地征收政策"由相对低标准的"保障型"向相对高标准的"保护型"政策制度变迁.
展开▼
