C-K理论视角下系统性创新方法比较及启示——以经典TRIZ、USIT、ASIT为例

摘要

The CK theory provides a clear explanation framework for engineering design, which opening up the black box of engineering design and problem solving process. An analysis and comparison of different systematic innovative methods are carried out based on the CK theory, depicting their basic procedures to suggest that classical contradiction matrix of TRIZ, together with USIT and ASIT, have their own merits, limitations and possible ways of improvement.On the basis of previous theory driven comparison, four prominent features of an "idealized innovative method" can be concluded, namely problem refinement, problem standardization, introduction of knowledge and verification of solutions.%C-K理论为工程设计提供了一个清晰、明确的解释框架,从而打开了工程设计及问题解决过程的黑箱.从C-K理论视角出发,把系统性创新方法所提供的问题解决流程视为C-K 理论中 4 个算子的有序排列,并将每种方法所提供的知识库视为K空间中的元素,考察经典 TRIZ、USIT以及 ASIT等系统性创新方法的概念方案产生过程.探讨每种方法解决问题过程中 K 空间结构或算子排列的缺陷,并提出 C-K 理论视角下理想化创新方法应该具备的四大基本特征,分别为问题提炼、问题化归、知识引入以及方案验证.