补阳还五汤联合空气波压力治疗仪治疗糖尿病高危足临床观察

摘要

Objective: Observed yang supplementing five returning decoction joint air wave pressure therapy for the treatment of the high risk diabetic foot clinical efficacy. Method, 112 cases of diabetic O foot lesions were randomly divided into a treatment group of 53 patients and a control group of 49 patients underwent conventional basic therapy, treatment group yang supplementing five returning decoction joint air wave pressure therapy for the treatment group and control group were treated with prostaglandin E1 treatment. After 4 weeks, summarize the curative effect evaluation. Result, Treatment group, 25 cases (47.2%) Significant effect, 14 cases (26.4%) good, 8 cases (15.1%) improved, 6 cases (11.3%)no effect, the total effective rate was 88.7%; control group, 7 cases (14.3%)Significant effect, 10 cases (20.4%) good, 27 cases (55.1%) improved, ineffective in 5 cases (10.2%), the total effective rate was 89.8%. The total effective rate difference between two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05), but compare to the control group, the efficiency of the treatment group was higher, the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion:yang supplementing five returning decoction joint air wave pressure treatment curative treatment of high risk diabetic foot, suitable for clinical application wildly.%目的：观察补阳还五汤联合空气波压力治疗仪治疗糖尿病高危足的临床疗效。方法：112例糖尿病足0级病变患者随机分为治疗组53例和对照组49例，均进行常规基础治疗，治疗组加用补阳还五汤联合空气波压力治疗仪治疗，对照组加用前列腺素E1治疗。4周后评价、总结疗效。结果：治疗组显效25例（47.2%），良好14例（26.4%），改善8例（15.1%），无效6（11.3%）例，总有效率88.7％；对照组显效7例（14.3%），良好10例（20.4%），改善27例（55.1%），无效5例（10.2%），总有效率为89.8％。两组总有效率比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)，但治疗组显效率高于对照组，差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论：补阳还五汤联合空气波压力治疗仪治疗糖尿病高危足疗效确切，适于临床推广应用。